Assessments of Girls' Genital Findings and the Likelihood of Sexual AbuseAgreement Among Physicians Self-rated as Skilled
Jan E. Paradise, MD;
Martin A. Finkel, DO;
Alexa S. Beiser, PhD;
Abbey B. Berenson, MD;
Donna B. Greenberg, MA;
Michael R. Winter, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(9):883-891.
Abstract
| |
Objectives
To measure agreement about genital examination findings among physicians who rate themselves as skilled in evaluating children for suspected sexual abuse, to compare these physicians' descriptions and interpretations with consensus standards developed by an expert panel, and to investigate the effects of physician and case characteristics on agreement.
Study Design
Questionnaires including 7 simulated cases, each consisting of a brief history and 1 photograph of a girl's genitalia, were mailed to random samples of 2 groups: the members of 4 physician organizations concerned with child abuse or pediatric gynecology, and pediatricians at large. Among the surveyed physicians who rated their own skill in evaluating cases of suspected sexual abuse as higher than average, we measured agreement, both overall and between those with the most and with less clinical experience, and assessed their conformity with consensus standard descriptions and interpretations.
Results
We received responses from 548 (50.9%) of 1076 physicians; 414 responses (75.5%) were analyzable. Two hundred six physicians (50%) rated themselves as skilled in assessing children for sexual abuse. On average, 45% of these physicians' descriptions and 72.6% of their interpretations conformed with the consensus standards. In 4 cases, between 5% and 20.7% of these physicians described genital findings that the expert panel had considered absent from the photographs. Conformity with standard interpretations tended to be higher in cases with photographs concordant with the accompanying, unambiguous histories (P=.06). The most experienced physicians resembled the expert panel more closely than did the less experienced self-rated skilled physicians in interpreting 3 simulated cases (P .001).
Conclusions
Assessments of girls' genital findings by physicians who rate themselves as skilled in examining children for suspected sexual abuse often differ. In some cases, among physicians who all rate themselves as skilled, assessments made by very experienced physicians may conform more closely to consensus standards than do assessments made by less experienced physicians.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:883-891
Footnotes
The affiliations of the authors appear in the acknowledgment section at the end of the article.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Variability in Expert Assessments of Child Physical Abuse Likelihood
Lindberg et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e945-e953.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review.
Davis et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1094-1102.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Criminal Investigations of Child Abuse: The Research Behind "Best Practices"
Jones et al.
Trauma Violence Abuse 2005;6:254-268.
ABSTRACT
Continuing Medical Education in Child Sexual Abuse: Cognitive Gains but Not Expertise
Botash et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:561-566.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Imperforate Hymen: Congenital or Acquired From Sexual Abuse?
Botash and Jean-Louis
Pediatrics 2001;108:e53-53.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Medical Research Agenda for Child Maltreatment: Negotiating the Next Steps
Theodore and Runyan
Pediatrics 1999;104:168-177.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Medical Evaluation of the Sexually Abused Child: Lessons From a Decade of Research
Atabaki and Paradise
Pediatrics 1999;104:178-178.
FULL TEXT
Influence of the History on Physicians' Interpretations of Girls' Genital Findings
Paradise et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:980-986.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
