You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 8, August 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Methodology to Maximize Resident Input in Improving a Pediatric Rotation

Joel A. Fein, MD; Jane M. Lavelle, MD; Kenneth R. Ginsburg, MD, MSEd; Angelo P. Giardino, MD, MSEd

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(8):840-844.


Abstract

Objective
To develop a structured process to gain resident input into the improvement of their educational experience by (1) taking a small amount of resident time and effort, (2) fostering the generation of new ideas, (3) allowing the prioritization of ideas, (4) generating implementation plans for the ideas, and (5) offering the participants relative anonymity.

Design
Cross-sectional survey and group sessions.

Setting
Urban, university-based children's hospital.

Participants
Members of the pediatric residency program in the 1993-1994 academic year.

Interventions and Results
The process was piloted for an emergency department rotation and borrows aspects of the Delphi Technique, Nominal Group Technique, and focus group methods. A survey regarding an emergency department rotation was distributed to all pediatric residents, and the 10 most commonly noted problems were compiled. These problems were brought to group sessions held for each level of training. Problems not listed were added if they were mentioned during the session; however, no problem was removed from the list. The sessions, designed to offer relative anonymity to the residents, included an initial clarification period, a roundrobin prioritization of ideas, and an open discussion designed to generate solutions. Resident-generated solutions resulting from the group sessions were reviewed by the attending staff, and changes were implemented during the next year.

Conclusion
The technique that we developed is a practical and time-efficient method of incorporating resident perspectives into the improvement of a rotation.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:840-844



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Emergency Medicine (Drs Fein and Lavelle), Section of Adolescent Medicine, General Pediatrics (Dr Ginsburg), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; the Division of Child Development and Rehabilitation, the Children's Seashore House (Dr Giardino); and the Department of Pediatrics, the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (Drs Fein, Lavelle, Ginsburg, and Giardino), Philadelphia, Pa.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.