You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 7, July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Penicillin vs Clindamycin for the Treatment of Aspiration Pneumonia in Children

Sheila J. Jacobson, MBBCh; Kathryn Griffiths; Shelley Diamond; Patricia Winders, RN; Michael Sgro, MD; William Feldman, MD; Colin Macarthur, MBBCh, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(7):701-704.


Abstract



Objective
To compare the effectiveness of intravenous penicillin vs clindamycin for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia.

Design
A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Setting
A tertiary care pediatric hospital.

Patients
We enrolled 42 children, aged 6 months to 18 years, who were admitted to the hospital for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. All of the children had underlying conditions that predispose to aspiration.

Intervention
The patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous penicillin G sodium, 250 000 U/kg every 24 hours, or intravenous clindamycin phosphate, 30 mg/kg every 24 hours.

Main Outcome Measure
The primary outcome measure was "time to ready for discharge" from the hospital.

Results
In an effectiveness (intention to treat) analysis, the median time (interquartile range) to ready for discharge from the hospital was 4.9 days (range, 2.8-6.5 days) in the penicillin-treated group and 3.4 days (range, 2.3-6.8 days) in the clindamycin-treated group (P=.66). Results were not markedly altered when adjusted for the age difference of the groups or in the efficacy analysis (after the exclusion of 9 patients who withdrew from the trial). Rates for readmission to the hospital were similar in the 2 groups.

Conclusion
Penicillin and clindamycin seem to be equally effective for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia in children hospitalized for this illness.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:701-704



Author Affiliations



From the Division of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Outcomes Research Team Program, Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Jacobson, Sgro, Feldman, and Macarthur and Ms Winders) and Pharmacy (Mss Griffiths and Diamond), Hospital for Sick Children, and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.