You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 7, July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

One-Year Experience With an Inpatient Asthma Clinical Pathway

Tao Sheng Kwan-Gett, MD; Paula Lozano, MD, MPH; Kathy Mullin, RN; Edgar K. Marcuse, MD, MPH

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(7):684-689.


Abstract

Objective
To study the effects of an inpatient asthma clinical pathway on the processes and outcomes for children who were admitted to a hospital for the treatment of asthma.

Design
Before-and-after study.

Setting
A private nonprofit academic children's hospital in Seattle, Wash.

Patients and Methods
Three hundred forty-two admissions of 297 patients in the first year of the asthma clinical pathway were compared with 353 admissions of 292 similar patients in the previous year. Patients who required intensive care, were younger than 2 years, or had a major chronic disease were excluded.

Intervention
Asthma was chosen for the development of a clinical pathway because of its large number of admissions, involvement of multiple health care providers (nurses, physicians, and respiratory therapists), predictable hospital course, and variable lengths of hospital stay. The pathway was a consensus-based guideline for patient management that was intended to be adapted to the care of an individual patient. Prior to the implementation of the clinical pathway, nurses, attending physicians, house staff, and respiratory therapists were trained in its use. The main hospital chart of each patient who was admitted to the pathway had a flow chart that outlined day-to-day guidelines for monitoring and care. Nursing staff were responsible for documenting when a patient's care varied from the pathway, and these variances were entered into a computer database.

Outcome Measures
Use of peak flowmeters, steroids, laboratory studies, radiological studies, and respiratory therapy was assessed by analyzing the patients' electronic billing records. For patients enrolled in the pathway, additional data on process of care were obtained by analyzing the variance database. For both groups, the total charges, length of stay, and rate of readmission to the hospital were measured by use of the billing records.

Results
There were no significant differences in the use of steroids or peak flowmeters, average lengths of stay, or total charges between the 2 groups. However, patients in the "pathway group" had significantly lower average charges for laboratory ($26 vs $39; P<.05) and radiology ($32 vs $55; P<.001) services. Variances from the pathway guidelines were most often related to the patients' responses to therapy.

Conclusions
The asthma clinical pathway had no effect on clinical outcomes and small effects on the use of resources. Further development, including physician and nurse training, computer and administrative support, and clinical severity scales, are needed to develop the potential utility of the clinical pathway as a research and quality assurance tool.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:684-689



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Pediatrics, University of Washington (Drs Kwan-Gett, Lozano, and Marcuse), and the Children's Hospital and Medical Center (Drs Kwan-Gett and Marcuse and Ms Mullin), Seattle, Wash.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of Admission-Day Crowding on the Length of Stay of Pediatric Hospitalizations
Lorch et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e718-e730.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of a Clinical Pathway in Curtailing Unnecessary Investigations in Children With Gastroenteritis
Lemberg et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:83-89.
ABSTRACT  

Asthma Intervention Program Prevents Readmissions in High Healthcare Users
Castro et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003;168:1095-1099.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Severe Asthma
McFadden
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003;168:740-759.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Evidence-Based Clinical Pathway for Bronchiolitis Safely Reduces Antibiotic Overuse
Wilson et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2002;17:195-199.
ABSTRACT  

Asthma Clinical Pathways: Toward What End?
Glauber et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:590-592.
FULL TEXT  

A Report Card on Quality Improvement for Children's Health Care
Ferris et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:143-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of a Clinical Pathway for Inpatient Asthma Management
Johnson et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:1006-1012.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of Asthma Care Provided by Hospitals in a Large Metropolitan Area: Results From the Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative
Grant et al.
Chest 1999;116 :162S-167S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comprehensive Educational Program Improves Clinical Outcome Measures in Inner-City Patients With Asthma
George et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1710-1716.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Cost-Saving Algorithm for Children Hospitalized for Status Asthmaticus
McDowell et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:977-984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.