You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 5, May 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comparison of injury during cadet basic training by gender

P. E. Bijur, M. Horodyski, W. Egerton, M. Kurzon, S. Lifrak and S. Friedman
Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. bijur@aecom.yu.edu

OBJECTIVES: To describe the rate and distribution of injuries during basic training in male and female cadets and to assess the contribution of pretraining conditioning and height to the male-female differential in injuries. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The US Military Academy, West Point, NY. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 558 cadets from the class of 1995 at the US Military Academy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate of injuries resulting in 1 or more days excused from physical activities per 100 cadets and the rate of injuries resulting in hospitalization of 1 night or longer per 100 cadets. RESULTS: Women had 2.5 times the rate of injuries as men and 3.9 times the rate of injuries resulting in hospitalization. Women had significantly more stress fractures and stress reactions than men. The median number of days excused from physical activities for women's injuries was significantly higher than that from men's injuries. Pretraining conditioning, measured by performance on a 2-mile (3.2-km) run, accounted for approximately half the difference in rates of injuries between men and women; differences in height among men and women did not account for differences in injury rates. CONCLUSIONS: The women had a higher risk for injury during military training than men. Increased pretraining conditioning may substantially decrease the risk for injury.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ethinyl oestradiol administration in women suppresses synthesis of collagen in tendon in response to exercise
Hansen et al.
J. Physiol. 2008;586:3005-3016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nature and risk factors of injury hospitalization in young adults: A follow-up of 135,987 military conscripts
Mattila et al.
Scand J Public Health 2007;35:418-423.
ABSTRACT  

Predictors of Stress Fracture Susceptibility in Young Female Recruits
Shaffer et al.
Am J Sports Med 2006;34:108-115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Lower Extremity Stress Fractures in Athletes and Soldiers: A Systematic Review
Jones et al.
Epidemiol Rev 2002;24:228-247.
FULL TEXT  

The Health and Hormone Status of Female Cadets and Active-Duty Women in the US Armed Forces
James
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:101-101.
FULL TEXT  

ARE FEMALE CADETS INJURED MORE THAN MALES IN BASIC TRAINING?
JWatch General 1997;1997:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.