Effect of the vaccines for children program on inner-city neighborhood physicians

G. Fairbrother, S. Friedman, K. L. Hanson and G. C. Butts
Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the probable effect of the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program on immunization coverage. DESIGN: Preintervention and postintervention study design, with data collected before and after enrollment in the VFC program. SETTING: Twenty-three inner-city neighborhood physicians' offices in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: In 1993, 30 physicians were randomly selected from 8 neighborhoods with the highest proportions of Medicaid-eligible individuals in New York City. In 1995-1996, the 30 physicians were contacted again. Twenty-three agreed to an interview and medical record review. Within each office, the medical records of children aged 3 to 35 months, with at least 3 visits in a 3-month or longer period, were randomly selected. Medical record reviews were conducted for 173 eligible children in 1993 and 528 in 1995-1996. INTERVENTIONS: The VFC program was implemented in October 1994. The administration fee increased from $2 to $17.85; physicians received vaccines free. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Up-to-date status for immunizations and lead and tuberculosis screening; percentage of visits that are missed opportunities to immunize; and percentage of visits that were well-child visits. Up-to-date status, missed opportunities to immunize, and well-child visits were compared across time using chi 2 analysis, corrected for the use of cluster sampling. RESULTS: Up-to-date status changed significantly before and alter enrollment in the VFC program (P < .05) for all immunizations and for lead and tuberculosis screening. For the diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, and pertussis vaccine, oral poliovirus vaccine, and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine combined, coverage increased from 17.9% to 42.2%, up by 24.3 percentage points (P < .05). Missed opportunities to immunize did not change, but well-child visits increased from 15.0% to 21.6% (P < .05). Physicians generally attributed performance improvements to the VFC program and not to other competing hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: The VFC program seems to be responsible for an increase in immunization rates among these physicians.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reminder Cards and Immunization Rates Among Latinos and the Rural Poor in Northeast Colorado
Hicks et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:581-586.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will financial incentives stimulate quality improvement? Reactions from frontline physicians.
Teleki et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:367-374.
ABSTRACT  

Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?
Petersen et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:265-272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Feasibility of Universal Influenza Vaccination for Infants and Toddlers
Humiston et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:867-874.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of Insurance Status and Vaccine Cost on Physicians' Administration of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine
Davis et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:521-526.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of the Vaccines for Children Program on Physician Referral of Children to Public Vaccine Clinics: A Pre-Post Comparison
Zimmerman et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:297-304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Physician Financial Incentives and Feedback to Improve Pediatric Preventive Care in Medicaid Managed Care
Hillman et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104:931-935.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vaccines for Children Program, United States, 1997
Santoli et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104:15e-15.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strategies to Sustain Success in Childhood Immunizations
The National Vaccine Advisory Committee
JAMA 1999;282:363-370.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Immunization Performance Measurement in a Changing Immunization Environment
Rodewald et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:889-897.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT