You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 12, December 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A clinic system to improve preschool vaccinations in a low socioeconomic status population

P. G. Harper, D. J. Madlon-Kay, M. G. Luxenberg and R. Tempest
Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, Minn., USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a clinic system to assess and vaccinate preschool-age children at every clinic visit can improve vaccination rates. DESIGN: A nonequivalent control group design contrasting an intervention clinic with a comparison clinic. SETTING: Two urban St Paul, Minn, clinics. The intervention clinic is a family practice residency clinic, and the comparison, clinic is a community health center clinic. PATIENTS: Primarily a low socioeconomic status white population. INTERVENTIONS: A clinic-wide system to identify and vaccinate children at all clinic visits. Appointment personnel, medical assistants, and physicians all had roles in the intervention protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of children at the 2 clinics who were up-to-date for a primary vaccine series at age 24 months and also at the end of the study collection periods, preintervention and postintervention. RESULTS: The intervention clinic improved the percentage of children up-to-date for a primary vaccine series at age 24 months from 42% to 56% (P = .02), while the percentage at the comparison clinic did not change significantly (P = .81). Similarly, the intervention clinic improved the percentage of children up-to-date for age at the end of the study periods from 49% preintervention to 63% postintervention (P = .02), while the percentage at the comparison clinic did not improve significantly (P = .45). The system was especially useful for children with few visits to the intervention clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Although the intervention clinic resulted in a substantial improvement in vaccination rates for preschool-age children, rates remained well below national goals. A combination of clinic, community, and national initiatives may be needed to ensure appropriate vaccination rates for this challenging patient population.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of a Practice-Based Intervention to Increase Vaccination Rates and Reduce Missed Opportunities
Minkovitz et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:382-386.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Report Card on Quality Improvement for Children's Health Care
Ferris et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:143-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Physician Financial Incentives and Feedback to Improve Pediatric Preventive Care in Medicaid Managed Care
Hillman et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104:931-935.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.