You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 10, October 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prevalence and Features of Joint Hypermobility Among Adolescent Athletes

Laura C. Decoster; James C. Vailas, MD; Rebecca H. Lindsay; G. Rhys Williams, MS

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(10):989-992.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the prevalence of joint hypermobility in a group of adolescent, interscholastic athletes.

Design
Cross-sectional; descriptive or observational.

Setting
Free preparticipation physical examinations for sports.

Subjects
Two hundred and sixty-four athletes (150 male, 114 female; average age, 15.5 years) comprised the entire set of athletes who came to our clinic for free physical examinations.

Intervention and Main Outcome Measures
We screened 264 athletes using the widely accepted Carter-Wilkinson-Beighton method, which examines range of motion at the knees, trunk, fingers, thumbs, and elbows bilaterally and employs a 0 to 9 scoring scheme (5=hypermobile). We also used an "injury allowance," whereby if an athlete screened positive for only one side of a bilateral test but had a history of injury to the corresponding side, he or she was given an injury allowance point.

Results
Thirty-two scored 5 or higher, with another 2 screening positive for hypermobility by the injury allowance, for a total of 34 hypermobile athletes (12.9%). There was a highly significant difference between sexes (P<.001), with 25 female (22%) and 9 male subjects (6%) testing positive.

Conclusions
The overall prevalence of hypermobility and the significant sex difference found in this group of adolescent athletes were similar to nonathlete populations of comparable age. Research on nonathletes has been relied on by many to recommend that hypermobile persons avoid strenuous physical activity; however, research on athletes is less than conclusive. Given that a significant segment of young athletes, especially females, may be hypermobile, prospective studies are warranted to investigate this question before we can justify depriving hypermobile youths of the many known benefits of regular or strenuous exercise.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:989-992



Author Affiliations

From the Healthsouth Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation/New Hampshire Musculoskeletal Institute, Manchester (Ms Decoster); the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Lahey-Hitchcock Clinic, Manchester (Dr Vailas); the University of Vermont, Burlington (Ms Lindsay); and Janssen Research Foundation, Titusville, NJ (Mr Williams).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effects of Generalized Joint Laxity on Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Young Female Athletes
Myer et al.
Am J Sports Med 2008;36:1073-1080.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benign joint hypermobility in childhood
Murray and Woo
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001;40:489-491.
FULL TEXT  

Hypermobility Syndrome
Russek
ptjournal 1999;79:591-599.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.