You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 1, January 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Evaluation of a statewide bicycle helmet law via multiple measures of helmet use

H. Ni, J. J. Sacks, L. Curtis, P. R. Cieslak and K. Hedberg
Center for Disease Prevention and Epidemiology, Oregon Health Division, Department of Human Resources, Portland, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an Oregon law requiring bicyclists younger than 16 year to wear a helmet and to compare methods of measuring helmet use. DESIGN: Four prelaw and postlaw statewide helmet use surveys: (1) statewide observations, (2) middle school observations, (3) classroom self-report surveys, and (4) a statewide adult telephone survey. SETTING: Oregon. SUBJECTS: Statewide observations, 3313 child bicyclists at 13 sites; middle school observations, 995 child bicyclists at 33 randomly selected middle schools; classroom self-report surveys, fourth, sixth, and eighth graders in 448 classrooms (ie, 8955 students) before the law was effected and 456 classrooms (ie, 9811 students) after the law was effected in 66 randomly selected schools; and statewide telephone survey, 1219 randomly called parents of 1437 children younger than 16 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prelaw and postlaw helmet use and ownership and knowledge and opinion about the law. RESULTS: Observed helmet use among youth was 24.5% before the law was effected and 49.3% after the law was effected. School-observed use increased from 20.4% to 56.1%. Classroom survey self-reported "always" use of helmets increased from 14.7% to 39.4%; reported use on the day of the survey increased from 25.8% to 76.0%. Telephone survey-reported "always" helmet use increased from 36.8% to 65.7%. Younger children and girls were more likely to use helmets. Most students (ie, 87.8%) and parents (ie, 95.4%) knew about the law; however, only 42.6% of children thought the law was a good idea. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) the law increased helmet use; (2) although use estimates differ, all helmet surveys showed similar degrees of prelaw and postlaw change; and (3) half of child bicyclists are still not wearing helmets, indicating a need for additional promotion of helmet wearing. Laws seem to be an effective way to increase helmet use.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Economic disparity in bicycle helmet use by children six years after the introduction of legislation.
Macpherson et al.
Inj. Prev. 2006;12:231-235.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bicycle helmet prevalence two years after the introduction of mandatory use legislation for under 18 year olds in Alberta, Canada.
Hagel et al.
Inj. Prev. 2006;12:262-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation to increase helmet use: a systematic review.
Karkhaneh et al.
Inj. Prev. 2006;12:76-82.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Children Should Wear Helmets While Ice-Skating: A Comparison of Skating-Related Injuries
McGeehan et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:124-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cycle helmet ownership and use; a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary school children in deprived areas
Kendrick and Royal
Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89:330-335.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Helmet laws and cycle use
Robinson et al.
Inj. Prev. 2003;9:380-381.
FULL TEXT  

Influence of Socioeconomic Status on the Effectiveness of Bicycle Helmet Legislation for Children: A Prospective Observational Study
Parkin et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:e192-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Children's bicycle helmet use and injuries in Hillsborough County, Florida before and after helmet legislation
Liller et al.
Inj. Prev. 2003;9:177-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Mandatory Helmet Legislation on Bicycle-Related Head Injuries in Children: A Population-Based Study
Macpherson et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:e60-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of state helmet laws on bicycle helmet use by children and adolescents
Rodgers
Inj. Prev. 2002;8:42-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of a State Law Mandating Use of Bicycle Helmets among Children: An Observational Evaluation
Kanny et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:1072-1076.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bicycle Helmets
Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention
Pediatrics 2001;108:1030-1032.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mandatory helmet legislation and children's exposure to cycling
Macpherson et al.
Inj. Prev. 2001;7:228-230.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 2
Towner et al.
Inj. Prev. 2001;7:249-253.
FULL TEXT  

Barriers to Bicycle Helmet Use
Finnoff et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:e4-4.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 1
Towner et al.
Inj. Prev. 2001;7:161-164.
FULL TEXT  

Why Do Child Cyclists in the United States Remain Unhelmeted?
Bergman and Rivara
Pediatrics 1999;104:107a-108.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.