Missed opportunities for vaccination and the delivery of preventive care
T. M. Ball and J. R. Serwint
Thomas-Davis Medical Centers, Tucson, AZ, USA.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative impact of 2 types of missed
opportunities (MOs) for vaccination, acknowledged and unacknowledged, on
the immunization status of children at 2 years of age and to measure the
delivery of immunizations and health care maintenance (HCM) after these
types of MOs. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: A large multispecialty
clinic serving primarily a managed care population in Tucson, Ariz.
PATIENTS: Charts of 1165 patients, ages 2 to 4 years, were reviewed for
immunization status by 2 years of age. Of these patients, 652 had received
all of their medical care at the clinic during their first 2 years of life.
The 76 patients found to be underimmunized (UI) at 2 years of age and 76
controls, who were fully immunized (FI) by 2 years of age, frequency
matched for age, were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The charts were
reviewed for the following information: sex, age, immunizations received,
HCM visits, sick visits, MOs, and pediatrician-patient interchange
regarding immunization status during visits. RESULTS: Of the children who
received all their care at the study site, 88% were FI. The mean number of
MOs per patient occurring during the first 2 years of life was 5.8 for the
UI children and 2.6 for the FI children. Only an unacknowledged MO, defined
as a visit when the patient's immunization status was not reviewed, was
associated with having a deficient immunization status at 2 years of age
(4.6 vs 1.7, P < .001). Acknowledged MOs did not differ between UI and
FI children (0.95 vs 0.76, P = .67). Immunizations were received at the
subsequent visit (within a month) twice as often following a visit at which
the child's deficient immunization status was acknowledged and a plan for
follow-up made (P < .001). However, HCM was often not completed at the
return visit. Following acknowledged MOs, patients did not return as
directed 25% of the time for UI children and 5% of the time for FI
children. Only 30% of FI patients completed the number of HCM visits
recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. CONCLUSIONS: In the
population studied, lack of review of the patients' immunization status was
the primary cause of MOs to vaccinate. Although patients returned
significantly more frequently when informed of their child's deficient
immunization status, poor follow-up remained a significant problem in
children who were eventually found to be lacking immunizations at 2 years
of age.
Brief Psychosocial Screening at Health Supervision and Acute Care Visits
Borowsky et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:129-133.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effect of Education, Feedback, and Provider Prompts on the Rate of Missed Vaccine Opportunities in a Community Health Center
Sabnis et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2003;42:147-151.
ABSTRACT
Prevalence and Predictors of Immunization Among Inner-City Infants: A Birth Cohort Study
Brenner et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:661-670.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effect of Different Definitions of a Patient on Immunization Assessment
O'Connor et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2001;91:1273-1275.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effectiveness of a Practice-Based Intervention to Increase Vaccination Rates and Reduce Missed Opportunities
Minkovitz et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:382-386.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Strategies to Sustain Success in Childhood Immunizations
The National Vaccine Advisory Committee
JAMA 1999;282:363-370.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Characteristics of Families Who Attend Free Vaccine Fairs
Hambidge et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104:158-163.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Community Volunteers on Immunization Rates of Children Younger Than 2 Years
Barnes et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:518-524.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Do Missed Opportunities Stay Missed? A 6-Month Follow-up of Missed Vaccine Opportunities in Inner City Milwaukee Children
Sabnis et al.
Pediatrics 1998;101
:e5-e5.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reducing Missed Opportunities to Vaccinate During Child Health Visits: How Effective Are Parent Education and Case Management?
Wood et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:238-243.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT