You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 8, August 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Extremely low-birth-weight children and their peers. A comparison of school-age outcomes

C. L. Halsey, M. F. Collin and C. L. Anderson
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To document 7-year developmental and educational outcomes in a cohort of predominantly white, middle-class, extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW, < 1000 g) children to address the incidence of increased developmental disability and the need for special educational services. DESIGN: Observational study. PATIENTS: Fifty-four ELBW children and 58 comparison children, who were matched for race, gender, and socio-economic status (30 with low birth weights [1500-2500 g] and 28 with birth weights > 2500 g). The ELBW cohort was drawn from 104 presurfactant survivors born between 1984 and 1986 and cared for in a single hospital. SETTING: Suburban, university-based tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Teachers' reports of classroom placement and special education services and tests of cognitive, motor, language, and visual-motor integration abilities were studied. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (50%) of 54 ELBW children were in regular classrooms with no special services compared with 21 (70%) of 30 in the low-birth-weight group and 27 (93%) of 28 in the full-term group, indicating a significant trend toward increasing need for special services with decreasing birth weight across the 3 groups (P < .001). The ELBW group scored significantly lower than the comparison groups on all tests, although generally within the average range. Seventy-nine percent of ELBW children had average cognitive scores, but they averaged 14 to 17 points lower than the 2 comparison groups. Twenty percent of the ELBW children had significant disabilities including cerebral palsy, mental retardation, autism, and low intelligence with severe learning problems. CONCLUSIONS: Even with optimal socioeconomic environments, 20% of ELBW children are significantly disabled, and 1 of every 2 ELBW children requires special educational services. Objective testing pinpointed weakness on all measures compared with matched peer groups.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Communication and Academic Challenges in Early Adolescence for Children Who Have Been Adopted From the Former Soviet Union
Beverly et al.
LSHSS 2008;39:303-313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Behaviour difficulties and cognitive function in children born very prematurely
Bayless et al.
International Journal of Behavioral Development 2008;32:199-206.
ABSTRACT  

Relation between Intrauterine Growth and Subsequent Intellectual Disability in a Ten-year Population Cohort of Children in Western Australia
Leonard et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:103-111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ensuring Accurate Knowledge of Prematurity Outcomes for Prenatal Counseling
Blanco et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:e478-e487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Concepts in Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Brodsky and Christou
J Intensive Care Med 2004;19:307-319.
ABSTRACT  

Psychiatric symptoms and disorders in adolescents with low birth weight
Indredavik et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F445-F450.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preschool Outcome of Less Than 801-Gram Preterm Infants Compared With Full-Term Siblings
Kilbride et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:742-747.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Educational and Social Competencies at 8 Years in Children With Threshold Retinopathy of Prematurity in the CRYO-ROP Multicenter Study
Msall et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:790-799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Continuing Care of NICU Graduates
Verma et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2003;42:299-315.
 

Longitudinal, 15-Year Follow-up of Children Born at Less Than 29 Weeks' Gestation After Introduction of Surfactant Therapy Into a Region: Neurologic, Cognitive, and Educational Outcomes
D'Angio et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:1094-1102.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pattern of Learning Disabilities in Children With Extremely Low Birth Weight and Broadly Average Intelligence
Grunau et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:615-620.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An 8-Year-Old Boy With Autism
Rapin
JAMA 2001;285:1749-1757.
FULL TEXT  

Neurodevelopmental and Functional Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993-1994
Vohr et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:1216-1226.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

School Difficulties at Adolescence in a Regional Cohort of Children Who Were Extremely Low Birth Weight
Saigal et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:325-331.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Educational Disabilities of Neonatal Intensive Care Graduates
Resnick et al.
Pediatrics 1998;102:308-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive, educational, and behavioural outcomes at 7 to 8 years in a national very low birthweight cohort
Horwood et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79:12F-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.