You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 7, July 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The Adolescents Training and Learning to Avoid Steroids (ATLAS) prevention program. Background and results of a model intervention

L. Goldberg, D. L. Elliot, G. N. Clarke, D. P. MacKinnon, L. Zoref, E. Moe, C. Green and S. L. Wolf
Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a school-based intervention to prevent anabolic androgenic steroid use among high-risk adolescent athletes. DESIGN: Nonrandom controlled trial. SETTING: Two urban high schools. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six adolescent football players at the experimental school and 24 players at the control school. INTERVENTION: Eight weekly, 1-hour classroom sessions delivered by the coach and adolescent team leaders, and eight weight-room sessions delivered by research staff. The intervention addressed sports nutrition and strength training as alternatives to steroid use, drug refusal role play, and antisteroid media campaigns. OUTCOME MEASURES: A preintervention and postintervention questionnaire that assessed attitudes toward and intent to use steroids and other drugs; knowledge of drug effects; and diet, exercise, and related constructs. RESULTS: Compared with controls, experimental subjects were significantly less interested in trying steroids after the intervention, were less likely to want to use them even if their friends used them, were less likely to believe steroid use was a good idea, believed steroids were more dangerous, had better knowledge of alternatives to steroid use, had improved body image, increased their knowledge of diet supplements, and had less belief in these supplements as beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: Significant beneficial effects were found despite the sample size, suggesting that the effects of the intervention was large. This outcome trial demonstrates an effective anabolic androgenic steroid prevention program for adolescent athletes, and the potential of team-based interventions to enhance adolescents' health.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is Abstinence an Alternative?: Predicting Adolescent Athletes' Intentions to Use Performance Enhancing Substances
Dodge and Jaccard
J Health Psychol 2008;13:703-711.
ABSTRACT  

The Use of Ergogenic Agents in High School Athletes
Rosenfield
The Journal of School Nursing 2005;21:333-339.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of a health promotion programme to prevent the misuse of androgenic anabolic steroids among Swedish adolescents
Nilsson et al.
HEALTH PROMOT INT 2004;19:61-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Promoting Healthy Lifestyles: Alternative Models' Effects (PHLAME)
Moe et al.
Health Educ Res 2002;17:586-596.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strength Training for Children and Adolescents
Guy and Micheli
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:29-36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Adolescents Training and Learning to Avoid Steroids Program: Preventing Drug Use and Promoting Health Behaviors
Goldberg et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:332-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.