You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 6, June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computer Instruction in Learning Concepts of Streptococcal Pharyngitis

Anthony E. Hilger, PhD; Harvey J. Hamrick, MD; Floyd W. Denny, Jr, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(6):629-631.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate a computer-assisted instruction unit covering the basic concepts of streptococcal pharyngitis for effectiveness as a learning tool.

Design
Randomized control trial.

Setting
A medical school associated with a tertiary care hospital.

Participants
Third-year medical students on a pediatric clerkship from December 1, 1992, to October 31, 1993.

Intervention
Students were randomized into a study or a control group and given a pretest on streptococcal pharyngitis. The study group then completed the computer-assisted instruction unit. No attempt was made to distinguish among the clinical experiences of the two groups during the next 4 weeks, after which a second test on streptococcal pharyngitis was given to both groups.

Main Outcome Measures
Outcome was measured by scores (percentage correct) from tests given at day 1 and week 4 of the clerkship.

Results
The posttest scores of the study group increased by an average of 12.1 above the pretest scores, but the scores of the control group were only 3.4 points higher. The difference between these increases is statistically significant (P<.01, Student's t test).

Conclusion
Short, well-designed computer-assisted instruction units can be effective tools in medical education.

(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1966;150:629-631)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Clinical Laboratory Science, Department of Allied Health Professions (Dr Hilger) and the Department of Pediatrics (Drs Hamrick and Denny), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education
Greenhalgh
BMJ 2001;322:40-44.
FULL TEXT  

Successful Teaching of Pediatric Fluid Management Using Computer Methods
Potts and Messimer
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:195-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.