You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 5, May 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Efficacy of Topical Anesthesia in Children

Robert J. Vinci, MD; Susan S. Fish, Pharm D

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(5):466-469.


Abstract

Objectives
To compare the efficacy of three formulations of a topical anesthetic solution composed of various concentrations of tetracaine hydrochloride, adrenaline (epinephrine), and cocaine hydrochloride (TAC), and to compare the cost of the topical anesthetic solutions with the cost of lidocaine infiltration.

Design
Randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Setting
Urban pediatric emergency department.

Participants
One hundred fifty-six children 3 to 18 years of age and older requiring topical anesthesia for suturing of lacerations.

Intervention
Children received 3 mL of one of the following study solutions: TAC 1 consisting of 0.5% tetracaine, 1:2000 dilution of adrenaline, 11.8% cocaine; TAC 2 that contained 1% tetracaine, 1:2000 dilution of adrenaline, 4% cocaine; or TAC 3 made up of 1% tetracaine and 4% cocaine, without adrenaline.

Measurements or Main Results
Patients were randomized to group 1 (n=49), group 2 (n=49), or group 3 (n=58), and received TAC 1, TAC 2, or TAC 3, respectively. Patients in the three study groups were similar for age, gender, anatomic location and length of the laceration, and history of sutures or use of topical anesthesia. Based on the physician assessment of achievement of complete, partial, or no anesthesia, solutions containing 11.8% cocaine (TAC 1) and 4% cocaine with adrenaline (TAC 2) were more likely to produce complete anesthesia than the solution with 4% cocaine without adrenaline (TAC 3) (P<.001, {chi}2). This difference was only noted when the laceration involved the face or scalp. A second dose of the TAC 3 solution was more often required to produce anesthesia when compared with the other two study drugs (P<.003, {chi}2). The final cost to produce 3 mL of the study drugs, including the vials, was $16.39 for TAC 1, $8.67 for TAC 2, and $8.41 for TAC 3.

Conclusions
The application of a TAC solution containing 4% cocaine is as effective as a TAC solution containing 11.8% cocaine. Use of the 4% solution decreases the cost of the agent. Adrenaline is a necessary ingredient in the anesthetic solution.

(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:466-469)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Pediatrics (Dr Vinci) and Emergency Medicine (Dr Fish), Boston (Mass) City Hospital.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is cocaine needed in topical anaesthesia?
Bush
Emerg. Med. J. 2002;19:418-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New Non-Cocaine-Containing Topical Anesthetics Compared With Tetracaine-Adrenaline-Cocaine During Repair of Lacerations
Smith et al.
Pediatrics 1997;100:825-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.