You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 5, May 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Efficacy of topical anesthesia in children

R. J. Vinci and S. S. Fish
Department of Pediatrics, City Hospital, Boston, Mass, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of three formulations of a topical anesthetic solution composed of various concentrations of tetracaine hydrochloride, adrenaline (epinephrine), and cocaine hydrochloride (TAC), and to compare the cost of the topical anesthetic solutions with the cost of lidocaine infiltration. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Urban pediatric emergency department. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-six children 3 to 18 years of age and older requiring topical anesthesia for suturing of lacerations. INTERVENTION: Children received 3 mL of one of the following study solutions: TAC 1 consisting of 0.5% tetracaine, 1:2000 dilution of adrenaline, 11.8% cocaine; TAC 2 that contained 1% tetracaine, 1:2000 dilution of adrenaline, 4% cocaine; or TAC 3 made up of 1% tetracaine and 4% cocaine, without adrenaline. MEASUREMENTS OR MAIN RESULTS: Patients were randomized to group 1 (n = 49), group 2 (n = 49), or group 3 (n = 58), and received TAC 1, TAC 2, or TAC 3, respectively. Patients in the three study groups were similar for age, gender, anatomic location and length of the laceration, and history of sutures or use of topical anesthesia. Based on the physician assessment of achievement of complete, partial, or no anesthesia, solutions containing 11.8% cocaine (TAC 1) and 4% cocaine with adrenaline (TAC 2) were more likely to produce complete anesthesia than the solution with 4% cocaine without adrenaline (TAC 3) (P < .001, chi 2). This difference was only noted when the laceration involved the face or scalp. A second dose of the TAC 3 solution was more often required to produce anesthesia when compared with the other two study drugs (P < .003, chi 2). The final cost to produce 3 mL of the study drugs, including the vials, was $16.39 for TAC 1, $8.67 for TAC 2, and $8.41 for TAC 3. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a TAC solution containing 4% cocaine is as effective as a TAC solution containing 11.8% cocaine. Use of the 4% solution decreases the cost of the agent. Adrenaline is a necessary ingredient in the anesthetic solution.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is cocaine needed in topical anaesthesia?
Bush
Emerg. Med. J. 2002;19:418-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New Non-Cocaine-Containing Topical Anesthetics Compared With Tetracaine-Adrenaline-Cocaine During Repair of Lacerations
Smith et al.
Pediatrics 1997;100:825-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.