You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 3, March 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The preparedness of pediatricians for emergencies in the office. What is broken, should we care, and how can we fix it?

G. Flores and D. J. Weinstock
Division of General Pediatrics, Boston (Mass) University School of Medicine, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of emergencies in pediatric practices, assess office emergency preparedness, and explore practitioner's reasons for levels of preparedness. DESIGN AND SETTING: Telephone survey of pediatric offices in Fairfield County, Connecticut. SAMPLE: Fifty-one (98%) of 52 offices participated, representing 481 staff. RESULTS: More than 2400 emergencies are seen each year in the pediatric offices, with a median of 24 emergencies per practice annually. Forty-two (82%) of the practices averaged at least one emergency per month, 13 (25%) experienced more than 50 emergencies annually, and seven (14%) experienced more than 100 emergencies annually. Of all eligible staff, 14% were certified in basic life support and 17% in pediatric advanced life support. The following emergency equipment was missing from offices: oxygen, 14 (27%); intravenous catheters, 14 (27%); bag-valve-mask, 15 (29%); nebulizers, 17 (33%); epinephrine 1:10 000, 27 (53%); and intravenous fluids, 28 (55%). Thirty-seven (73%) of offices had the minimum recommended equipment and training for status asthmaticus management; only 17 (33%) of offices had similar preparation for each of the six other emergencies. High-level emergency preparedness was rare. The perceptions of office pediatricians are that office emergencies are rare, and emergency preparedness is difficult to achieve because practices are too busy and the expense and time commitment are too great. CONCLUSIONS: Emergencies are common in pediatric practices, but problems in the emergency preparedness of practices persist despite previous studies with similar findings, and publication of guidelines. Perceptions of practitioners suggest that not enough effort has been devoted to increasing practitioner awareness of these problems. Greater awareness might result by emphasizing practical instruction in residency and continuing medical education courses, and by publication of guideline summaries.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preparation for Emergencies in the Offices of Pediatricians and Pediatric Primary Care Providers
Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Pediatrics 2007;120:200-212.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Office Preparedness for Pediatric Emergencies: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Office-Based Training Program
Bordley et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:291-295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methodologic Flaws, Wrong Answers, and Right Questions: Pediatric Office Emergencies
Flores; and Heath
Pediatrics 2001;108:1052-1053.
FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Office Emergencies and Emergency Preparedness in a Small Rural State
Heath et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:1391-1396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

EMERGENCIES IN PEDIATRIC OFFICES
JWatch General 1996;1996:9-9.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.