You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 3, March 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Optical immunoassay for rapid detection of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci. Should culture be replaced?

T. A. Schlager, G. A. Hayden, W. A. Woods, S. M. Dudley and J. O. Hendley
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an optical immunoassay rapid antigen test to detect group A beta-hemolytic streptococci directly from throat swab specimens. DESIGN: Criterion standard with "blinded" comparison. Double-swab pharyngeal samples were obtained; one swab was cultured and the other was used for the rapid antigen test. SETTING: Microbiology laboratory in a primary care center at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-two outpatients with pharyngitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The results of the optical immunoassay rapid antigen test were compared with results of standard aerobic culture. RESULTS: Sixty-two (24%) of 262 samples were culture-positive; 48 of these 62 were positive by the optical immunoassay rapid test (sensitivity, 77%). Of the 200 culture-negative samples, seven (4%) were positive by the rapid test (specificity, 96%). CONCLUSION: The optical immunoassay performed well, but like other rapid tests, is not sensitive enough to replace standard culture for detection of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Relationship Between the Clinical Likelihood of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis and the Sensitivity of a Rapid Antigen-Detection Test in a Pediatric Practice
Edmonson and Farwell
Pediatrics 2005;115:280-285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rapid Diagnosis of Pharyngitis Caused by Group A Streptococci
Gerber and Shulman
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004;17:571-580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spectrum Bias of a Rapid Antigen Detection Test for Group A {beta}-Hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngitis in a Pediatric Population
Hall et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:182-186.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sensitivity of a Rapid Antigen Detection Test for Group A Streptococci in a Private Pediatric Office Setting: Answering the Red Book's Request for Validation
Armengol et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:924-926.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Management of Adults with Pharyngitis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Neuner et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:113-122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Pharyngitis
Bisno
NEJM 2001;344:205-211.
FULL TEXT  

Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Impact of a High-Sensitivity Antigen Test on Physician Outcome
Needham et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998;36:3468-3473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Culture Confirmation of High-sensitivity Rapid Streptococcal Tests Make Sense? A Medical Decision Analysis
Webb
Pediatrics 1998;101 :e2-e2.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Which Method Best Detects Group A Strep?
Journal Watch Dermatology 1996;1996:13-13.
FULL TEXT  

WHICH METHOD BEST DETECTS GROUP A STREP?
JWatch General 1996;1996:6-6.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.