You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 12, December 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Child Restraint Device Use in Patients Leaving a Children's Hospital

William T. Zempsky, MD; Daniel J. Isaacman, MD; Kevin M. Sullivan, PhD, MPH, MHA

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(12):1284-1287.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the frequency of and factors associated with the use of child restraint devices (CRDs) in patients leaving an urban children's hospital.

Design
Verbally administered survey, followed by observation of CRD use.

Setting
Main parking area at an urban children's hospital with mandated use of parking attendants.

Participants
A convenience sample of 295 parents or guardians who were leaving the hospital and were accompanied by at least 1 child younger than 48 months.

Results
Eighty percent of the respondents were female; 77% of the respondents were white and 22% were African American. Two hundred thirty-five (80%) used CRDs. Subjects who were at risk of CRD noncompliance included nonwhite individuals (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-14.5), those whose primary source of medical care was from a public clinic (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3) or from a specialty clinic (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.8-6.6), and those who were older than 24 months (OR, 8.7; 95% CI, 3.5-21.9). Parental education and income level were not important predictors of CRD compliance controlling for race, primary medical care source, and age. Study participants were observed for incorrect CRD use; 30% (30/99) of infants younger than 12 months were incorrectly placed in the forward-facing position, and 23% (54/235) of all CRD users did not use its harness.

Conclusions
Patients who use public clinics or pediatric subspecialists as their primary source of medical care, especially those who are African Americans, are at risk of CRD noncompliance. Children's hospitals should take an active role in improving CRD use in these patients.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:1284-1287



Author Affiliations

Nia Sipp

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (Drs Zempsky and Isaacman); and the Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Sullivan). Ms Sipp is an undergraduate at Emory University.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Determining the Proportion of Children Too Heavy for Age-Appropriate Car Seats in a Practice-Based Research Network
Basco et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2009;48:37-43.
ABSTRACT  

The Association Between Hands-On Instruction and Proper Child Safety Seat Installation
Lane et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:924-929.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.