You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 10, October 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Attitudes About Sibling Visitation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Elaine C. Meyer, PhD; Karen F. Kennally, RN; Effie Zika-Beres, LICSW; William J. Cashore, MD; William Oh, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(10):1021-1026.


Abstract

Objective
To survey the attitudes and recommendations of staff members before and after the implementation of sibling visitation in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Design
Staff survey conducted before (1992) and after (1993) the implementation of sibling visitation.

Setting
A perinatal tertiary care center.

Participants
Staff members including physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, social workers, and unit clerks (n=139 in 1992; n=120 in 1993).

Measurements and Main Results
A 7-point Likert scale survey (1=strongly disagree; 7=strongly agree) was designed for the study. In both 1992 and 1993, the staff most strongly agreed that visitation requires special supervision, should have designated times, increases sibling knowledge, enhances sibling attachment to the baby, and increases family satisfaction. Wilcoxon rank sum tests comparing the staff across the 2 years indicated substantial attitudinal changes in favor of sibling visitation, including less perceived interference with nursing care and nursery routines (P<.01) and less concern about the infants' risk of respiratory infection and exposure to chickenpox (P<.05). There was greater attitudinal agreement between disciplines in 1993 than in 1992, suggesting better staff consensus about sibling visitation following its implementation. The recommended minimum age for visitation was 4.67 years and 4.05 years in 1992 and 1993, respectively. Brief visits of 10 to 15 minutes' duration were consistently recommended. Staff rated the sibling visitation program as successful (median=6) on a scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 7 (very successful).

Conclusions
Staff members have concerns about sibling visitation that include increased risk of infection, organization, and supervision. A sibling visitation program that addresses these concerns can be successfully implemented and supported by staff, thereby fostering family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:1021-1026



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Meyer, Cashore, and Oh), Health Education and Perinatal Outreach (Ms Kennally), and Social Work (Ms Zika-Beres), Women & Infants' Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.