You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Teenage childbearing. An adaptive strategy for the socioeconomically disadvantaged or a strategy for adapting to socioeconomic disadvantage?

C. Stevens-Simon and R. Lowy
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between childbearing and educational and vocational achievements of American females high school students. DATA SOURCE: Articles published in English during the past decade about the educational, vocational, and socioeconomic sequelae of childbearing among female high school students. DATA SELECTION: Articles that did not contain data about the relation between adolescent childbearing and educational and vocational achievement were excluded. DATA SYNTHESIS: Most females who begin childbearing during adolescence obtain less schooling and poorer-paying jobs than do females who postpone childbearing. The reasons for this are elusive. Differences in the family and cultural backgrounds of early (high school-age) and later (18 years and older) childbearers explain some but not all of the association between early childbearing and educational and vocational underachievement. The effect of childbearing preferences on the educational and vocational achievements of teenagers has not been studied adequately. Lack of concrete information could result in underestimation of the effect of early childbearing on the socioeconomic well-being of young Americans, and create the impression that adolescent pregnancy is an adaptive response to urban poverty. CONCLUSIONS: As much as the long-term socioeconomic sequelae of adolescent childbearing reflect factors that influence the judgments young people make about the costs and benefits of contraception and parenthood, adolescent childbearing is a means of adapting to urban poverty. Thus postponing adolescent conceptions and parenthood may have a less important effect on the socioeconomic well-being of young Americans than expected.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Delaying Second Births Among Adolescent Mothers: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Home-Based Mentoring Program
Black et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:e1087-e1099.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ducks Have Ducks Unless...
Stevens-Simon and Ginsburg
Pediatrics 2003;111:446-447.
FULL TEXT  

"A single petticoat"
Huengsberg and Radcliffe
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2002;78:318-320.
FULL TEXT  

Adolescent Parenting: Relationship to School Attendance and Achievement
Casserly et al.
The Journal of School Nursing 2001;17:329-335.
ABSTRACT  

Providing Effective Reproductive Health Care and Prescribing Contraceptives for Adolescents
Stevens-Simon
Pediatr. Rev. 1998;19:409-417.
FULL TEXT  

Correlates and Consequences of Early Removal of Levonorgestrel Implants Among Teenaged Mothers
Stevens-Simon and Kelly
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:893-898.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reasons For First Teen Pregnancies Predict the Rate of Subsequent Teen Conceptions
Stevens-Simon et al.
Pediatrics 1998;101 :e8-e8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.