The Pediatric Symptom ChecklistSupport for a Role in a Managed Care Environment
Michael Jellinek, MD;
Michelle Little;
J. Michael Murphy, EdD;
Maria Pagano, EdM
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(7):740-746.
Abstract
Objectives
To gather data based on studies of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist, identify risk factors associated with high levels of dysfunction in primary care pediatric settings, and explore the relationship between common risk factors and psychosocial problems identified by pediatricians.
Design
Retrospective review and cross-sectional, case-referent survey.
Setting
Subjects were selected from three primary care pediatric clinics in Massachusetts: a private practice in a predominantly white, middle-class suburb, an urban health maintenance organization clinic, and an inner-city clinic.
Participants
Of 423 outpatients aged 6 to 12 years screened for psychosocial problems, 72 children and their families were seen for in-depth structured and clinical interviews (24 from each site).
Interventions
None.
Measurements/Main Results
Children with a single parent and/or those who were economically disadvantaged were significantly more likely to show psychosocial impairment. The specificity of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist was 100% in samples with a lower socioeconomic status compared with 68% in middle-class samples, and sensitivity was 95% in middle-class samples compared with 80% in lower-class samples. Pediatricians identified psychosocial problems in eight of 15 children with a history of familial mental illness or substance abuse and seven of eight children with a history of physical or sexual abuse, but only six of 17 cases from single-parent families and four of 11 cases from poor families.
Conclusions
Pediatricians should be sensitive to psychosocial dysfunction especially in single-parent and low-income families. Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist for psychosocial screening in a managed health care delivery system could target capitated resources efficiently by providing early identification and secondary prevention of psychosocial morbidity.
(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:740-746)
Author Affiliations
From the Child Psychiatry Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Measuring outcomes in outpatient child psychiatry: The contribution of electronic technologies and parent report
Murphy et al.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2011;16:146-160.
ABSTRACT
Increasing Parent-Pediatrician Communication about Children's Psychosocial Problems
Hayutin et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2009;34:1155-1164.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevalence of Developmental and Behavioral Disorders in a Pediatric Hospital
Petersen et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:e490-e495.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Targeted Child Psychiatric Services: A New Model of Pediatric Primary Clinician--Child Psychiatry Collaborative Care
Connor et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2006;45:423-434.
ABSTRACT
Diagnostic performance of the CBCL-Attention Problem Scale as a screening measure in a sample of Brazilian children with ADHD
Lampert et al.
J Atten Disord 2004;8:63-71.
ABSTRACT
Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist in a Low-Income, Mexican American Population
Jutte et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003;157:1169-1176.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Brief Psychosocial Screening at Health Supervision and Acute Care Visits
Borowsky et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:129-133.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Psychosocial Morbidity: The Economic Burden in a Pediatric Health Maintenance Organization Sample
Bernal et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:261-266.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Developmental Approaches to the Patient with Pediatric and Psychiatric Comorbidity
Steiner
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999;4:309-324.
ABSTRACT
Use of Checklists in Pediatric Practice
Cheng et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996;150:768-769.
ABSTRACT
Screening for Psychosocial Problems in 4-5-Year-Olds During Routine EPSDT Examinations: Validity and Reliability in a Mexican-American Sample
Pagano et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1996;35:139-146.
ABSTRACT
|
