You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 6, June 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The plain abdominal roentgenogram in the management of encopresis

R. M. Rockney, W. H. McQuade and A. L. Days
Department of Pediatrics, Brown University, Memorial Hospital, Pawtucket, RI 02860, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fecal retention in encopretic children can be assessed objectively using the plain abdominal roentgenogram and whether roentgenographic evidence of fecal retention is associated with clinical findings on presentation in encopretic children. DESIGN: Retrospective case studies. SETTING: Two pediatric incontinence clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty children (72% male), aged 4 to 18 years (mean, 8 years), who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria for the diagnosis of encopresis. All had a plain abdominal roentgenogram obtained on presentation. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Using a systematic assessment tool with good interrater reliability (kappa = 0.65), 78% (47) of the children had fecal retention by roentgenographic criteria on presentation, while 22% (13) did not. Retentive encopretic children were less likely to have a history of difficult toilet training (P = .018) than nonretentive encopretic children. There was no association between fecal retention and several clinical factors, including historical features commonly attributed to fecal retention. Retentive encopretic children were no more likely to have a palpable abdominal mass than nonretentive encopretic children, but they were more likely to have excessive stool on rectal examination (P = .015). Using the plain abdominal roentgenogram as the gold standard, the rectal examination showed a positive predictive value of 84.8% and a negative predictive value of 50% in assessing fecal retention. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal retention in encopretic children can be assessed objectively from a plain abdominal roentgenogram. Most, but not all, encopretic children present with fecal retention. A positive rectal examination is strongly predictive of fecal retention, in which case a roentgenogram is not necessary to make that diagnosis. A negative rectal examination may not rule out fecal retention, in which case an abdominal roentgenogram may be useful to make that diagnosis.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An Important Issue in the Management of Elimination Dysfunction in Children: Parental Awareness of Constipation
Akyol et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2007;46:601-603.
ABSTRACT  

Digital Rectal Examination and the Primary Care Physicians: A Lost Art?
Safder et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2006;45:411-414.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic Value of Abdominal Radiography in Constipated Children: A Systematic Review
Reuchlin-Vroklage et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:671-678.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health related quality of life in disorders of defecation: the Defecation Disorder List
Voskuijl et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89:1124-1127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis of constipation: clinical factors and colonic transit time
de Lorijn et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89:723-727.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictive Factors for Short-term Symptom Persistence in Children After Emergency Department Evaluation for Constipation
Patel et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:1204-1208.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guideline for the Management of Pediatric Idiopathic Constipation and Soiling
Felt et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:380-385.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.