You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 4, April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Assessing the quality of care for children. Prospects under health reform

E. A. McGlynn, N. Halfon and A. Leibowitz
RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

The failure to pass federal health reform legislation this year does not mean that the health care crisis has been solved. As we look forward to predictably more incremental efforts to reduce costs, increase access, and improve quality, key issues from the most recent round of deliberations will undoubtedly reemerge. In the last session of Congress, private and public policymakers sent a clear signal that the era of accountability had arrived. In the health reform bills that Congress considered last year, a range of "measurement" strategies were put forth as essential elements for achieving accountability in a reformed health care system. For example, routine monitoring of the quality of care delivered by health plans and health providers was viewed as necessary to balance the impact of policies to control the cost of health care. Each of the major bills that were introduced this past year--Gephardt/Mitchell (S 1757/HR 3600), Cooper/Grandy (HR 3222), Breaux/Durenburger (S 1579), Nickles (S 1743), Chafee/Thomas (S 1770/HR 3704), and Wellstone/McDermott (S 491/HR 1200)--and the mark-up bills that have emerged from Senate and House committees have placed considerable emphasis on evaluating changes in access to health care and quality of care. Although the bills addressed issues related to financing, coverage, and the structure of the delivery system quite differently, they demonstrated much more consensus with regard to quality monitoring.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health-Related Quality of Life Among Preadolescent Children With Oral Clefts: The Mother's Perspective
Damiano et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e283-e290.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pattern of diagnostic and therapeutic care of childhood epilepsy in Alexandria, Egypt
BASSILI et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:277-284.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care of Children With Chronic Diseases in Alexandria, Egypt: The Models of Asthma, Type I Diabetes, Epilepsy, and Rheumatic Heart Disease
Bassili et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:12e-12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Indicators of Children's Mental Health Services: Do They Predict Improved Client Outcomes?
Noser and Bickman
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 2000;8:9-18.
ABSTRACT  

Validating Quality Indicators: Quality as Relationship Between Structure, Process, and Outcome
Salzer et al.
Eval Rev 1997;21:292-309.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.