You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Access to Home Apnea Monitoring and Its Impact on Rehospitalization Among Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Michael H. Malloy, MD, MS; Barry Graubard, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(3):326-332.


Abstract

Objective
To examine the relationship between home apnea monitoring and sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and medical factors and the risk for rehospitalization among very-low-birth-weight infants (birth weight <1500g).

Design and Setting
Analysis of live infants born weighing less than 1500 g; these data were obtained from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. Data from this survey were obtained by maternal questionnaires and from birth certificates and medical records. Outcome Measure: One or more hospitalizations after discharge from the hospital of delivery.

Results
Home apnea monitor use was strikingly lower among black infants (19.8%) compared with nonblack infants (43.7%) (P<.001). The rate of rehospitalization for blacks was 24.8%, which was lower than the rate of 34.3% for nonblacks (P=.001). Neither annual family income nor method of hospital payment was associated with rehospitalization. The use of an apnea monitor in the home was associated with an increased odds ratio for rehospitalization for both blacks (odds ratio, 2.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 4.21) and nonblacks (odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.51 to 3.45). With adjustment for the use of an apnea monitor, the odds ratio for rehospitalization of blacks vs nonblacks was no longer significant (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.08).

Conclusions
The use of an apnea monitor in the home was highly associated with an increased risk for rehospitalization. Whether this increased risk was attributable to a valid reason for rehospitalization or to closer scrutiny of the infant could not be determined. The lower prevalence of apnea monitor use among blacks is unexplained.

(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:326-332)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (Dr Malloy), and the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (Dr Graubard).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Apnea Frequently Persists Beyond Term Gestation in Infants Delivered at 24 to 28 Weeks
Eichenwald et al.
Pediatrics 1997;100:354-359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.