You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gravid Students

Characteristics of Nongravid Classmates Who React With Positive and Negative Feelings About Conception

Catherine Stevens-Simon, MD; Constance Boyle, CHA

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(3):272-275.


Abstract

Objective
To determine whether gravid classmates affect nongravid students' feelings about conception.

Method
Cross-sectional survey of a school-based clinic population. We asked 130 nulliparous high school students who were seeking routine health care at an urban school-based clinic to complete an anonymous questionnaire concerning risk factors for and attitudes about teen pregnancy.

Results
The respondents were grouped according to the effect that contact with gravid classmates had on their desire for conception: increased desire (n=13), no change in desire (n=59), and decreased desire (n=49). The analysis disclosed no significant group differences for age (mean±SD, 16.3±1.2 years), sex (65% female), welfare use (20%), or living situation (85% lived with a parent). The increased-desire group had significantly more sociodemographic risk factors for teen pregnancy than did the groups with no change and decreased desire. The group with increased desire was significantly more likely than the other two groups to be failing in school (54% vs 44% and 12.2%; P<.001), to have low education goals (15.4% vs 3.4% and 0%; P=.02), to be unhappy with their family support (69.2% vs 27.1% and 29.8%; P=.01), to be concerned about sterility (30.8% vs 8.6% and 6.1%; P=.03), not to be using contraceptives (77% vs 35.6% and 30.6%; P<.01), to want a pregnancy within 2 years (61.5% vs 25.4% and 12.2%; P<.001), and to have a sexual partner who wanted a pregnancy within 2 years (61.5% vs 13.6% and 8.2%; P<.0001).

Conclusions
Our findings support the study hypothesis that that never-pregnant students in the increased-desire group had more sociodemographic risk factors for teen pregnancy than did students in the groups with no change or decreased desire. The results of this study may help to ally concerns about the adverse effect that the increased prevalence of gravid students in American schools might have on the childbearing attitudes of never-pregnant students.

(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:272-275)



Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of Adolescent Medicine, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver (Dr Stevens-Simon), and Denver Health and Hospitals (Ms Boyle).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Teen Childbearing Trends: Which Tide Turned When and Why?
Stevens-Simon and Kaplan
Pediatrics 1998;102:1205-1206.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.