You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Long-term Outcome After Severe Brain Injury in Preschoolers Is Worse Than Expected

Marjaleena Koskiniemi, MD, PhD; Timo Kyykkä, MSc; Taina Nybo, MSc; Leo Jarho, MD, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(3):249-254.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the long-term outcome after severe brain injury at preschool age.

Design
Follow-up until adult life.

Setting
A centralized guidance center for all trafficassociated injuries.

Patients
Children with severe brain injury at preschool age between January 1959 and December 1969.

Main Outcome Measure
Final evaluation in adulthood was performed by our team. The capability to work and live independently was rated.

Results
Twenty three (59%) of 39 children attended a typical school, eight (21%) attended a school for the physically disabled, and seven (18%) attended a school for the mentally retarded; information was not available for one child. In adulthood, nine patients (23%) were able to work full-time, 10 (26%) worked at sheltered workplaces, 14 (36%) lived independently at home, and six (15%) needed physical and/or psychotherapeutic support. The difference between normal school performance (59%) and capability to work full-time (23%) was significant (P<.05). In evaluating different aspects after the severe brain injury, the sense of identity was the best indicator of final outcome.

Conclusions
The final evaluation of severe brain injury at preschool age should be performed in adulthood. Normal school performance or normal intelligence functioning is not a guarantee for good long-term prognosis. To let the child develop a firm identity is essential for good outcome.

(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:249-254)



Author Affiliations

From the Kauniala Hospital for Disabled War Veterans and the Rehabilitationcentre of Insurance Companies, Kauniainen, Finland (Drs Koskiniemi and Jarho and Messrs Kyykkä and Nybo), and the Department of Virology, University of Helsinki (Dr Koskiniemi), Finland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Context-Sensitive Cognitive-Behavioral Supports for Young Children With TBI: A Second Replication Study
Feeney and Ylvisaker
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 2008;10:115-128.
ABSTRACT  

Topical Review: Head Injury in Children
Adelson and Kochanek
J Child Neurol 1998;13:2-15.
ABSTRACT  

The Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Are We Asking the Right Questions?
McCormick
Pediatrics 1997;99:869-869.
FULL TEXT  

Long-term Outcome After Severe Brain Injury in Preschoolers Is Worse Than Expected
Vigil-Sewell and Sargent
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996;150:228-228.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.