
Barriers to Wearing Bicycle Safety Helmets in the Netherlands
Gerard H. P. Seijts, MPH;
Gerjo Kok, PhD;
Lex M. Bouter, PhD;
Helen A. J. Klip, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(2):174-180.
Abstract
 |  |
Objective To explore behavioral factors that determine whether children (aged 7 to 13 years) wear bicycle safety helmets.
Design Cross-sectional survey.
Setting Three Dutch primary schools in Breda, Maastricht, and Terneuzen, the Netherlands.
Participants Two hundred fifty-nine children aged 7 to 13 years.
Intervention Wearing a bicycle safety helmet for 6 consecutive weeks.
Results Information about experiences with the bicycle safety helmet was gathered via questionnaires. Wearing a bicycle safety helmet was described as inconvenient, time-consuming, and uncomfortable. Children also perceived negative reactions from their social environment.
Conclusions Planned health promotion activities will be essential for the introduction of bicycle safety helmets to be successful. These activities should focus particularly on developing a comfortable bicycle safety helmet, creating facilities to store bicycle safety helmets, and changing negative social norms regarding wearing a bicycle safety helmet.
(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:174-180)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Health Education, University of Limburg, Maastricht (Mr Seijts, Dr Kok, and Ms Klip), and the Extramural Health Care Research (EMGO) Institute, Free University, Amsterdam (Dr Bouter), the Netherlands.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Injury mortality among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands.
Stirbu et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2006;60:249-255.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Factors associated with bicycle helmet use among young adolescents in a multinational sample
Klein et al.
Inj. Prev. 2005;11:288-293.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bicycle helmet use among schoolchildren--the influence of parental involvement and children's attitudes
Berg and Westerling
Inj. Prev. 2001;7:218-222.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|