This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Effect of Method on Chronic Condition Rates

Dorothy Jones Jessop, PhD; Ruth E. K. Stein, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(10):1105-1110.

Abstract
Objective
To determine rates of chronic physical conditions for children and youths.

Design
Secondary analysis of the Health Examination Surveys, cycles 2 and 3, National Center for Health Statistics.

Setting
National household survey of noninstitutionalized civilians in the United States.

Participants
Multistage probability samples of children aged 6 to 11 years (cycle 2,1963 to 1965) and youths aged 12 to 17 years (cycle 3, 1966 to 1970), and a longitudinal subsample assessed at both times. Excludes persons with an IQ lower than 80.

Results
Selected items from developmental and medical histories and screening physical examinations were used to classify those with chronic physical conditions. Rates ofpersons with chronic conditions are 25.2% for the children and 35.3% for the youths. Parental histories produce rates equal to or greater than 11%, and physical examinations produce rates of 15.7% for children and 22% for youths. About 4% in each cycle are identified by both screening physical examination and parental history. Little overlap occurs in identification by the two sources, accounting for the higher rates for the combined indicators. Combining data sources identifies 13% of the longitudinal subsample as having a chronic physical condition at both times.

Conclusions
Rates of chronic physical conditions seem to be altered by combining different indicators to categorize children. For either source used alone (eg, parental report or physician screening physical examination) the estimate is similar in magnitude, but the composition of the affected group differs. These findings have major implications for research, service, and policy.

(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:1105-1110)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. Dr Jessop is now with the Medical and Health Research Association of New York City Inc.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Definitions and Measurement of Chronic Health Conditions in Childhood: A Systematic Review
van der Lee et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2741-2751.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chronic Conditions, Functional Limitations, and Special Health Care Needs in 10- to 12-Year-Old Children Born at 23 to 25 Weeks' Gestation in the 1990s: A Swedish National Prospective Follow-up Study
Farooqi et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:e1466-e1477.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Asthma in Young Children: Does Reporting Source Affect Our Conclusions?
Miller
Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:245-250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Limitations and Special Health Care Needs of 10- to 14-Year-Old Children Weighing Less Than 750 Grams at Birth
Hack et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:554-560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Operationalizing a Conceptually Based Noncategorical Definition: A First Look at US Children With Chronic Conditions
Stein and Silver
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:68-74.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Epidemiologic Profile of Children With Special Health Care Needs
Newacheck et al.
Pediatrics 1998;102:117-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implications for Estimates of Disability in Children: A Comparison of Definitional Components
Westbrook et al.
Pediatrics 1998;101:1025-1030.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT