You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 6, June 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Articles
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intraosseous Adenosine

As Effective as Peripheral or Central Venous Administration?

Sarah J. Getschman, MD; Ann M. Dietrich, MD; Wayne H. Franklin, MD; Hugh D. Allen, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148(6):616-619.


Abstract



Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine if intraosseous administration of adenosine is effective and, if so, to establish therapeutic dosage criteria for the intraosseous route compared with peripheral or central venous routes.

Research Design
Randomized, unblinded, crossover, within-animal control study.

Setting
University hospital in Ohio.

Subjects
Thirty newly weaned piglets.

Selection Procedure
Consecutive sample.

Interventions
Thirty newly weaned pigs were transesophageally (n=26) or transvenously (n=4) paced at a cycle length that was 10% longer than the Wenckebach threshold. The minimum effective dose of adenosine necessary to induce atrioventricular block during pacing was recorded for peripheral venous, central venous, and intraosseous routes.

Measurements and Results
The baseline resting heart rate and Wenckebach thresholds were not statistically different between subjects or between different routes of administration. The intraosseous route required a minimum effective dose of 127 µg/kg. Using a log transformation, the difference between central venous and peripheral venous doses was found to be statistically significant. The intraosseous dose was not statistically different from the central venous or peripheral venous doses.

Conclusion
The intraosseous route is an effective way of administering adenosine. The peripheral venous dose required to achieve atrioventricular block is higher than the central venous dose and the intraosseous dose is intermediary to the central venous and peripheral venous doses.

(Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148:616-619.



Author Affiliations



From the Division of Clinical Pharmacology/Toxicology (Dr Getschman), the Division of Emergency Medicine (Dr Dietrich), and the Division of Cardiology, (Drs Franklin and Allen), the Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Children's Hospital, Columbus.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

2005 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) of Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Advanced Life Support
American Heart Association
Pediatrics 2006;117:e1005-e1028.
FULL TEXT  

Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support
Circulation 2005;112:IV-167-IV-187.
FULL TEXT  

Intraosseous infusions in the adult
Greaves et al.
Trauma 1999;1:291-299.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.