You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Infrared Eye Injury Not due to Radiant Warmer Use in Premature Neonates

Stephen Baumgart, MD; Alison Knauth; Francis X. Casey; Graham E. Quinn, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(5):565-569.


Abstract



• Objective.
—Exposure to far-wavelength infrared radiation ({lambda}>2000 nm) may cause corneal opacity, miosis, and delayed cataracts (onset >30 days). Near-wavelength infrared exposure ({lambda}<1000 nm) may focus on the retina, causing burns; however, early eye examinations in neonates nursed under radiant warmers have failed to reveal acute injuries. Our purpose is to report long-term ophthalmologic outcome in infants treated under radiant warmers from birth.

Participants and Methods.
—We report findings from eye examinations in infants followed up to a median age of 2 years, 9 months (range, 1 to 75 months), for (1) 33 infants nursed exclusively under radiant warmers for up to 5 days postnatally (mean [±SD] birth weight, 1.16±0.24 kg; mean gestation, 30±2 weeks) and (2) 14 convection-warmed incubator-nursed infants 1.26±0.22 kg, 31 ±2 weeks), who were slightly more mature.

Main Result.
—A trend toward retinopathy of prematurity was noted as occurring more frequently in the radiant warmer–nursed infant population, and one infant in that group was blind. However, no macular burns and no permanent corneal, lens, or other anterior segment injuries were observed.

Conclusion.
—Preliminary findings do not support permanent eye damage attributable to near- or far-wavelength infrared injury in neonates nursed under radiant warmers.

(AJDC. 1993;147:565-569)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (Dr Baumgart), and the Department of Pediatrics, School of Biomedical Engineering (Ms Knauth) and the Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine (Dr Quinn), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Dr Quinn); and the Air Shields Inc/Vickers Corporation, Hatboro, Pa (Mr Casey).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication November 30, 1992.

Presented at the Society for Pediatric Research, May 1, 1991; New Orleans, La.

Reprint requests to Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 700, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (Dr Baumgart).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.