You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 147 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Infrared eye injury not due to radiant warmer use in premature neonates

S. Baumgart, A. Knauth, F. X. Casey and G. E. Quinn
Department of Pediatric, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.

OBJECTIVE--Exposure to far-wavelength infrared radiation (lambda > 2000 nm) may cause corneal opacity, miosis, and delayed cataracts (onset > 30 days). Near-wavelength infrared exposure (lambda < 1000 nm) may focus on the retina, causing burns; however, early eye examinations in neonates nursed under radiant warmers have failed to reveal acute injuries. Our purpose is to report long-term ophthalmologic outcome in infants treated under radiant warmers from birth. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS--We report findings from eye examinations in infants followed up to a median age of 2 years, 9 months (range, 1 to 75 months), for (1) 33 infants nursed exclusively under radiant warmers for up to 5 days postnatally (mean [+/- SD] birth weight, 1.16 +/- 0.24 kg; mean gestation, 30 +/- 2 weeks) and (2) 14 convection-warmed incubator-nursed infants (1.26 +/- 0.22 kg, 31 +/- 2 weeks), who were slightly more mature. MAIN RESULTS--A trend toward retinopathy of prematurity was noted as occurring more frequently in the radiant warmer-nursed infant population, and one infant in that group was blind. However, no macular burns and no permanent corneal, lens, or other anterior segment injuries were observed. CONCLUSION--Preliminary findings do not support permanent eye damage attributable to near- or far-wavelength infrared injury in neonates nursed under radiant warmers.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Natural Protective Mechanisms Against Endoscopic White-Light Injury in the Fetal Lamb Eye
DEPREST et al.
Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:124-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.