You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 7, July 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The changing epidemiology of neural tube defects. United States, 1968-1989

I. H. Yen, M. J. Khoury, J. D. Erickson, L. M. James, G. D. Waters and R. J. Berry
Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga. 30333.

OBJECTIVE--To describe the recent trends and epidemiologic characteristics of neural tube defects in the United States. RESEARCH DESIGN--Ongoing surveillance data. SETTING--Two birth defect surveillance systems: the nationwide Birth Defects Monitoring Program and the Metropolitan Atlanta (Ga) Congenital Defects Program for 1970 through 1989 and 1968 through 1989, respectively. PARTICIPANTS--Between 1970 and 1989, using discharge diagnoses of approximately 1 million live-born and stillborn infants per year, the Birth Defects Monitoring Program identified 15,503 cases of spina bifida and anencephaly. Between 1968 and 1989, using discharge diagnoses and clinical records until age 1 year of 38,000 infants per year, the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program identified 800 cases of spina bifida and anencephaly. INTERVENTIONS--None. MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS--Nationwide, neural tube defect rates have declined from 1.3 per 1000 births in 1970 to 0.6 per 1000 births in 1989. In Atlanta, neural tube defect rates have declined from 2.0 per 1000 births in 1968 to 0.6 per 1000 births in 1989. Several changes in the epidemiologic characteristics of neural tube defects were observed: (1) the proportion of spina bifida cases has increased; (2) the proportion of neural tube defect cases compared with the proportion of other unrelated defects has increased; (3) the race ratio of whites to other races for isolated neural tube defect cases has declined in Atlanta; and (4) the rate of isolated neural tube defects in females has also decreased. CONCLUSIONS--The declining rates of neural tube defects can be partially explained by increased widespread prenatal diagnostic techniques, strongly suggesting the role of environmental factors in neural tube defects. In particular, the use of multivitamins and folic acid to prevent the occurrence of neural tube defects needs further evaluation. Nevertheless, the changing clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of cases over time points to the etiologic heterogeneity of these conditions.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Maternal and paternal occupational exposure to agricultural work and the risk of anencephaly
Lacasana et al.
Occup. Environ. Med. 2006;63:649-656.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dietary Intake and Blood Folate Levels in Honduran Women of Childbearing Age
Holden et al.
J Child Neurol 2002;17:341-345.
ABSTRACT  

Prevalence and secular trend of congenital anomalies in Glasgow, UK
Dastgiri et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2002;86:257-263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Public Health 101 for Informaticians
Koo et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2001;8:585-597.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Infant Mortality From Congenital Malformations in the United States, 1970-1997
Lee et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:620-627.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Folate, Homocysteine and Neural Tube Defects: An Overview
van der Put et al.
Exp. Biol. Med. 2001;226:243-270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decline in Prevalence of Neural Tube Defects in a High-Risk Region of the United States
Stevenson et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:677-683.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parents' and Pediatricians' Views of Individuals with Meningomyelocele
Blaymore Bier et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1996;35:113-117.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.