An unsuccessful cotinine-assisted intervention strategy to reduce environmental tobacco smoke exposure during infancy
B. A. Chilmonczyk, G. E. Palomaki, G. J. Knight, J. Williams and J. E. Haddow
Division of Biometry, Foundation for Blood Research, Scarborough, Me. 04070-0190.
OBJECTIVE--To test a low-intensity physician's office-based intervention
strategy using infant urine cotinine measurements, aimed at reducing infant
exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. DESIGN--A randomized intervention
trial. SETTING--Offices of 28 physicians (pediatricians and family
practitioners) and two hospital-based clinics in the Greater Portland, Me,
area. PARTICIPANTS--Infants brought to the physician by a parent (usually
the mother) for an initial well-child visit. A total of 518 of these
infants and their mothers consented to provide information about household
smoking habits and to provide a sample of the infant's urine for
biochemical analysis. SELECTION PROCEDURE--From among the consecutive
sample of 518 enrolled mother/infant pairs, 103 mothers reported that they
smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day, and these were randomized on an
individual basis for intervention (52 pairs) or control (51 pairs).
Randomization took place at the study center when the infant's urine sample
and information about household smoking habits were received.
INTERVENTION--The physician telephoned the mother to report the urine
cotinine result and to explain its meaning. The physician then signed and
sent an individualized form letter to the mother, providing specific
recommendations for changing household smoking habits. RESULTS--Follow-up
urine cotinine measurements were obtained in 27 (52%) of 52 infants from
the intervention group and in 29 (57%) of the 51 controls 2 months later.
The mean log ratio of the follow-up to initial urine cotinine measurements
was 6% lower in the intervention group than in the control group. This
difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION--The low-intensity
intervention strategy did not significantly influence infant exposure to
environmental tobacco smoke in the household.
Parent reported home smoking bans and toddler (18-30 month) smoke exposure: a cross-sectional survey
Spencer et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005;90:670-674.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
State-of-the-Art Interventions for Office-Based Parental Tobacco Control
Winickoff et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:750-760.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Intervention With Parental Smokers in an Outpatient Pediatric Clinic Using Counseling and Nicotine Replacement
Winickoff et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:1127-1133.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Addressing Parental Smoking in Pediatrics and Family Practice: A National Survey of Parents
Winickoff et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:1146-1151.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Smoking Cessation Intervention for Parents of Children Who Are Hospitalized for Respiratory Illness: The Stop Tobacco Outreach Program
Winickoff et al.
Pediatrics 2003;111:140-145.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Controlled Trial of an Environmental Tobacco Smoke Reduction Intervention in Low-Income Children With Asthma
Wilson et al.
Chest 2001;120:1709-1722.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Child health-centre-based promotion of a tobacco-free environment--a Swedish case study
Arborelius and Bremberg
HEALTH PROMOT INT 2001;16:245-254.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Pediatrician's Role in Reducing Tobacco Exposure in Children
Stein et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:66e-66.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure Among Urban Children
Hopper and Craig
Pediatrics 2000;106:47e-47.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reported measures of environmental tobacco smoke exposure: trials and tribulations
Hovell et al.
Tobacco Control 2000;9:22i-28.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Impact of a Brief Intervention on Maternal Smoking Behavior
Groner et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:267-271.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia
Borland et al.
Tobacco Control 1999;8:266-271.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Advising parents of asthmatic children on passive smoking: randomised controlled trial
Irvine et al.
BMJ 1999;318:1456-1459.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT