You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 1, January 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Call for Clarification of Vitamin D Recommendations

DAVID A. BLANDINO, MD
Shadyside Hospital Family Practice Residency 5230 Centre Ave Pittsburgh, PA 15232

Am J Dis Child. 1992;146(1):14.


Abstract

Sir.-I have two questions concerning the letter by Bhowmick et al1 that appeared in the February 1991 issue of AJDC. First, in the last paragraph of the letter, the authors stated, "Although it may be true that some breast-fed infants do not routinely need vitamin D supplements, we do recommend 400 IU of supplementary vitamin D per day in all breast-fed black infants regardless of geographic location." I want to know what the authors meant by "some."

The second issue pertains to the quality of evidence that "proves" that this regimen adequately prevents rickets. No reference was given for that claim, and I am eager to know the source




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.