You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 6, June 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Meconium for Drug Testing

Edward C. Maynard, MD; Louis P. Amoruso, PhD; William Oh, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(6):650-652.


Abstract

• Samples of meconium from 28 neonates born to women suspected of drug abuse were tested for drugs of abuse (ie, cocaine, morphine, codeine, and marijuana). In each case, testing of urine from the mother, the newborn, or both had been ordered by the attending physician because of suspected maternal drug abuse. Seventeen (61%) of 28 meconium samples tested positive; 28 (60%) of 47 urine samples were positive. Meconium test results were concordant with the results of maternal or newborn urine testing in 24 (86%) of the 28 cases. In three cases, meconium was positive for cocaine when newborn urine was negative; in one case, meconium was negative when maternal urine was positive for cocaine. Compared with the combination of maternal and newborn urine testing, meconium testing had an 82% positive predictive value (14/17) and a 91% negative predictive value (10/11). Collection of meconium is simpler and more reliable than collection of urine, and testing of meconium was easily incorporated into routine procedures at a busy commercial laboratory. Meconium is a useful sample for drug detection in newborns.

(AJDC. 1991;145:650-652)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Dr Maynard); Clinical Science Laboratory Inc, Mansfield, Mass (Dr Amoruso); and Department of Pediatrics, Brown University, Providence, RI (Dr Oh).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 5, 1990.

Read before the New England Perinatal Society, Manchester, Vt, February 24, 1990.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

New Methods for Neonatal Drug Screening
Chan et al.
NeoReviews 2003;4:e236-244.
FULL TEXT  

Mortality Within the First 2 Years in Infants Exposed to Cocaine, Opiate, or Cannabinoid During Gestation
Ostrea Jr et al.
Pediatrics 1997;100:79-83.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of intrauterine illicit drug exposure by newborn drug testing
Kwong and Ryan
Clin. Chem. 1997;43:235-242.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Great Lakes Fish as a Source of Maternal and Fetal Exposure To Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Waller et al.
Toxicol Ind Health 1996;12:335-345.
 

MECONIUM USED FOR DRUG DETECTION
JWatch General 1991;1991:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.