This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Historical Perspective

Frank R. Greer, MD; Rima D. Apple, PhD

Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(3):282-286.

Abstract
• The recent advent of new advertising campaigns for infant formulas aimed at the general public via television commercials, newspapers, free formula coupons, and lay periodicals has disrupted a comfortable symbiotic relationship between infant food manufacturers and the medical profession that has endured for more than 50 years. In the late 19th century, physicians were concerned about the advertising claims of these products and generally felt that indications and directions for their use should be the province of the physician. Between 1929 and 1932, the American Medical Association, through its Committee on Foods and "Seal of Acceptance," essentially required the entire formula industry to advertise only to the medical profession. Since 1932, the US formula industry has developed into a $1.6 billion market. In 1988, Nestlé (absent from the US infant formula industry since the 1940s) acquired the Carnation Company and launched an advertising campaign to the general public for its formula products. Bristol Myers/Mead Johnson, in cooperation with Gerber Products Company, quickly followed suit. These actions threaten to once again remove the realm of infant feeding from the exclusive supervision of the medical profession. The new multimedia public advertising campaigns may increase the cost of infant formula to the general public and have a negative impact on the incidence of breast-feeding. In addition, formula advertising campaigns will likely increase the danger of advertising hyperbole and affect the level of financial support by formula companies for scientific meetings, medical research, education, and social events at medical meetings.

(AJDC. 1991;145:282-286)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Pediatrics (Dr Greer) and History of Medicine (Dr Apple), University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication October 25, 1990.

Reprint requests to the Wisconsin Perinatal Center, 202 S Park St, Madison, WI 53715 (Dr Greer).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

From Maine to Mississippi: Hospital Distribution of Formula Sample Packs Along the Eastern Seaboard
Merewood et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:823-827.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Marketing Infant Formula Through Hospitals: the Impact of Commercial Hospital Discharge Packs on Breastfeeding
Rosenberg et al.
AJPH 2008;98:290-295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Timing and Predictors of the Early Termination of Breastfeeding
Ertem et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:543-548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Suckling Induces Rapid Intestinal Growth and Changes in Brush Border Digestive Functions of Newborn Pigs
Zhang et al.
J. Nutr. 1997;127:418-426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Fresh Look at the Risks of Artificial Infant Feeding
Walker
J Hum Lact 1993;9:97-107.
ABSTRACT  

The Many Ways of Marketing Artificial Baby Milk
Auerbach
J Hum Lact 1992;8:61-62.