You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Coma Scales in Pediatric Practice

Jerome Y. Yager, MD, FRCPC; Bruce Johnston, PhD; Sahashi S. Seshia, MD, FRCP(C&E)

Am J Dis Child. 1990;144(10):1088-1091.


Abstract

• Interobserver variability for six coma scales was assessed prospectively on a sample of 15 comatose children, by two physicians, in a double-blind fashion. The six scales were the Glasgow Coma Scale, the Simpson and Reilly Scale, the Children's Coma Score, the Children's Orthopedic Hospital and Medical Center Scale, the Jacobi Scale, and the 0 to IV Scale. Interobserver variability was measured by using disagreement rate and the {kappa} statistic. The results from both methods were generally concordant. The disagreement rate for the various items in the different scales ranged from a high of 0.20 to a low of 0.03. The disagreement rate was greater than 0.10 for verbal responses in the Children's Coma Score and Glasgow Coma Scale and for both items in the Children's Orthopedic Hospital and Medical Center Scale. The disagreement rate was 0.10 or less for the 0 to IV Scale and for all items in the Simpson and Reilly and Jacobi scales. The relatively high interobserver agreement for these scales makes them more suitable for the pediatric setting than the other three scales, since good agreement is essential for interpreting data reliably, both in clinical practice and for research.

(AJDC. 1990;144:1088-1091)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Pediatric Neurosciences (Dr Yager and Seshia) and Department of Statistics (Dr Johnston), University of Manitoba and Children's Hospital (Drs Yager and Seshia), Winnipeg, Canada.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 20, 1989.

Read before the XXIII Canadian Congress of Neurological Sciences, Quebec City, Canada, June 16, 1988.

Reprint requests to Section of Pediatric Neurosciences, University of Manitoba, Children's Hospital, 840 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3A1S1 (Dr Seshia).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Epidemiology of head injury
JENNETT
Arch. Dis. Child. 1998;78:403-406.
FULL TEXT  

Development of a modified paediatric coma scale in intensive care clinical practice
Tatman et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 1997;77:519-521.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hearing loss during bacterial meningitis
Richardson et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 1997;76:134-138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.