You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 11, November 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Criteria for Recognition of the Growth-Inefficient Child Who May Respond to Treatment With Growth Hormone

Giuseppe Saggese, MD; Graziano Cesaretti, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1989;143(11):1287-1293.


Abstract



• In this study three groups of short children composed of 104 subjects (61 boys, 43 girls) were evaluated for spontaneous secretion of growth hormone (GH). Group 1 consisted of 10 subjects (6 boys, 4 girls) with "classic" GH deficiency. Group 2 consisted of 31 subjects (17 boys, 14 girls) with "nonclassic" GH deficiency. Group 3 consisted of 63 subjects (38 boys, 25 girls) with short normal stature. Blood samples were drawn every 20 minutes over 24 hours, and the mean GH concentration, nocturnal GH concentration, diurnal GH concentration, pulse amplitude, and number of pulses with a GH peak above 5 µg/L were determined. The values for mean height, height velocity, bone age to chronological age ratio, somatomedin C concentration, GH concentration, nocturnal GH concentration, diurnal GH concentration, pulse amplitude, and number of pulses with a GH peak over 5 µg/L were significantly greater in group 3 than in group 2, and these same values, except for the mean diurnal GH concentration, were greater in group 2 than in group 1. The mean GH concentration correlated with the mean nocturnal GH concentration. Subjects in groups 1 and 2 were treated with GH for 1.23±0.53 years (mean ± SD). All the group 1 subjects and 27 (87%) of the group 2 subjects responded with an increase in height velocity greater than 2 SDs per year of therapy. In conclusion, 87% of subjects with a normal GH response to provocative stimuli testing who had a mean height velocity of less than 4 cm/y, mean height lower than the third percentile, mean bone age to chronological age ratio of less than 0.8, and mean GH concentration less than 3 µg/L responded to GH therapy.

(AJDC. 1989;143:1287-1293)



Author Affiliations



From the Endocrine Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pisa, Italy.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication March 20, 1989.

Reprint requests to Endocrine Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pisa, Via Roma 35, 56100 Pisa, Italy (Dr Saggese).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lumbar Bone Mineral Density at Final Height and Prevalence of Fractures in Treated Children with GH Deficiency
Baroncelli et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002;87:3624-3631.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.