You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 6, June 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Labial Adhesions and Posterior Fourchette Injuries in Childhood Sexual Abuse

John McCann, MD; Joan Voris, MD; Mary Simon, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(6):659-663.


Abstract



• Six cases Involving six sisters, all of whom were sexually molested, are presented to illustrate the association between labial adhesions and posterior fourchette injuries in sexually abused children. Although labial adhesions are a relatively common lesion, they only recently have been associated with childhood sexual abuse. Labial adhesions are ordinarily found in girls between 2 months and 7 years of age and are usually very superficial and disappear spontaneously by the time the child approaches puberty. We encountered six sisters, all of whom had been sexually abused, who had labial adhesions. Four of the six had changes in the area of the posterior fourchette that were consistent with previous trauma. In addition, four of the girls' hymens had thickened, irregular edges or other changes that were considered abnormal. The father, the grandfather, and an uncle confessed to lewd and lascivious misconduct with the children. Although labial adhesions alone are not reason enough to make a report of sexual abuse, the physician is obligated to inquire as to the possible cause if the adhesions do not fit the usual pattern or if there are other suspicious findings.

(AJDC 1988;142:659-663)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Pediatrics, Valley Medical Center, Fresno, Calif.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Nov 30, 1987.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

BENEATH THE SURFACE
Thomas
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2004;89:ep15-ep22.
FULL TEXT  

Problems for Physicians Dealing with Sexual Abuse Evaluations
Kienberger Jaudes and Zimo
CLIN PEDIATR 1992;31:731-741.
 

Is it Sexual Abuse?: Confusion Caused by a Congenital Anomaly of the Genitalia
Adams and Horton
CLIN PEDIATR 1989;28:146-148.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.