You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 2, February 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lateral Positioning of the Stable Ventilated Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infant

Effect on Transcutaneous Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide

Mary Ellen A. Bozynski, MD; Ronald A. Naglie, MD; Joanne J. Nicks, RRT; Barbara Burpee, LPT; Robert V. Johnson, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(2):200-202.


Abstract

• Eighteen stable very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) mechanically ventilated infants with chronic lung disease were studied to examine the effects of right and left lateral positioning in contrast to supine positioning on transcutaneous (tc) oxygen (tcPo2) and carbon dioxide measurements (tcPco2). The neonates were studied at a median postnatal age of 31 days (range, 17 to 57 days) and had median birth weights and gestational ages of 975 g (range, 570 to 1360 g) and 27.5 weeks (range, 24 to 30 weeks), respectively. Median fraction of inspiratory oxygen was 0.32 (range, 0.23 to 0.40). The sequence of study positions was randomly determined. Sleep state as well as tcPo2 and tcPco2 were recorded every 30 s for five minutes. A significant difference in mean tcPo2 or tcPco2 was not detected for any of the positions. Lateral positioning may facilitate the development of midline behavior in VLBW infants. Care givers are often reluctant to position infants in side lying, however, because of concerns that ventilation or oxygenation might be compromised. We conclude that placing the stable VLBW mechanically ventilated infant in a side-lying position has no deleterious effects on oxygenation and ventilation, as measured by tcPo2 and tcPco2, and therefore should be encouraged.

(AJDC 1988;142:200-202)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Newborn Services, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 5, 1987.

Reprint requests to Section of Newborn Services, University of Michigan Medical Center, L3023 Women's Hospital, Box 0254, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0254 (Dr Bozynski).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.