You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 1, January 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Short-Course Antibiotic Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Children

A Methodological Review of the Literature

Michael Moffatt, MD, FRCP(C); Joanne Embree, MD, FRCP(C); Paul Grimm, MD; Barbara Law, MD, FRCP(C)

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(1):57-61.


Abstract

• We performed a methodological review of 14 published clinical trials of short-course (≤4 days) vs conventional (seven to ten days) antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infection in children. Four reviewers independently assessed each study, without knowledge of authorship, according to 35 criteria, 14 of which were considered critical for this type of study. Reviewer ratings were summed so that any study could receive a potential score of 140 for all criteria and 56 for the critical criteria. Only one study met more than 75% of all the criteria, whereas four studies met 75% of critical criteria. Two studies found short-course antibiotic therapy significantly less effective than conventional therapy. The remaining 12 had insufficient sample size to warrant the conclusion that the two therapies were equivalent. We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to warrant the use of short-course antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infection in children and that a much larger study, with attention to some of the details described, is warranted.

(AJDC 1988;142:57-61)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, and Division of Community and Northern Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Dr Embree is now with the Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobi, Kenya, East Africa, and Dr Grimm is now with Izaak Walton Killam Hospital for Children, Halifax, Nova Scotia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 18, 1987.

Reprint requests to the Division of Community and Northern Medicine, University of Manitoba, 61 Emily St, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 1Y9 (Dr Moffatt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Short compared with standard duration of antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infection: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Michael et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2002;87:118-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical evidence: Urinary tract infection in children
Larcombe
BMJ 1999;319:1173-1175.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.