You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 5, May 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Somatic Growth After Kidney Transplantation

Beneficial Effect of Cyclosporine in Comparison With Conventional Immunosuppression

Gisela Offner, MD; Peter F. Hoyer, MD; Harald Jüppner, MD; Hans P. Krohn, MD; Johannes Brodehl, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1987;141(5):541-546.


Abstract



• Growth performance was evaluated in 69 children, aged 3 to 16 years, who had undergone kidney transplantation between 1974 and 1984. Forty children (21 boys, 19 girls) who received transplants before September 1982 were treated conventionally with azathioprine and high-dose prednisolone; 29 children (13 boys, 16 girls) who received transplants after September 1982 were treated with cyclosporine and low-dose prednisolone. The mean (±SD) survival times of grafts in the azathioprine and cyclosporine groups were 6.0 ± 2.1 years and 1.4±0.5 years, respectively. Height and bone age were evaluated at the time of transplantation, one year after transplantation, and at reevaluation In December 1985. Growth rates expressed by standard deviation scores (SDS) declined in the azathioprine group for boys (mean,—2.2 at transplantation,—2.5 after one year, and—2.8 in December 1985) and girls (–2.1,—2.4, and—2.7) and improved in the cyclosporine group for boys (–2.5,—2.2, and—2.1) and girls (–2.2,—1.9, and—1.8). The difference between both groups one year after transplantation was significant. This trend continued beyond the first year after transplantation. Graft function was better in the azathioprine group than in the cyclosporine group. Bone age in December 1985 was less retarded in the cyclosporine group, but this could have been related to the shorter observation time. We conclude that somatic growth after kidney transplantation Is below expected rates under azathioprine-prednisolone Immunosuppression but Is significantly better under cyclosporineprednisolone immunosuppression.

(A JDC 1987;141:541-546)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Metabolic Disorders, Children's Hospital and Hannover Medical School, Hannover, West Germany.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Oct 24, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Metabolic Disorders, Kinderklinik, Konstanty Gutschow Str 8, D-3000 Hannover, West Germany (Dr Offner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.