This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Linda J. VanMarter, MD, MPH; Flora Taylor; Michael F. Epstein, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1987;141(2):149-153.

Abstract
• We undertook a cross-sectional epidemiologic study of potential determinants of parental consent for neonatal autopsy at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston. Data were abstracted from maternal and infant medical records in 184 cases of neonatal death occurring between January 1982 and October 1984. The o+verall consent rate for neonatal autopsy was 72%. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression found previous fetal loss, gestational age, and cause of death to be significantly different between the groups of consenters and nonconsenters. Parents least likely to consent to autopsy were those who had no history of previous fetal loss, who had pregnancies in which the birth weight of the infant was less than 1000 g or the gestational age was less than 28 weeks, or those who had an infant die of extreme prematurity. Factors not significantly associated with consent were maternal age, race, marital status, transfer status, type of prenatal care, the infant's sex, and the staff position of the requester. A second phase of the study surveyed physicians' attitudes regarding the importance of neonatal autopsy. The staff position and previous experience of the physician-requester, in addition to the presumed cause of the infant's death, were significantly associated with the rating assigned to the importance of the autopsy. These findings suggest that the mother's past and present obstetrical experience, the presence of extreme prematurity, and possibly the attitude and experience of the physician requesting autopsy permission may exert important influences on the likelihood of obtaining consent for a neonatal autopsy.

(AJDC 1987;141:149-153)

Author Affiliations
From the Joint Program in Neonatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Oct 8, 1986.

Presented at The New England Perinatal Conference, Newport, RI, Oct 8, 1985.

Reprint requests to the Joint Program in Neonatology, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr VaanMarter).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

International Perspectives: The Role of the Neonatal Necropsy Today: A Scottish Perspective
Laing and Becher
NeoReviews 2006;7:e177-e182.
FULL TEXT  

Autopsy after death due to extreme prematurity
Elder and Zuccollo
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F270-f272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature
Snowdon et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F200-F203.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists
Snowdon et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F204-F207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents
Snowdon et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F208-F211.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paying Our Last Respects: The Neonatal Autopsy as Continuing Care and Ethical Obligation
Battaglia
NeoReviews 2003;4:e207-211.
FULL TEXT  

Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study
Brodlie et al.
BMJ 2002;324:761-763.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consent to autopsy for neonates
McHaffie et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;85:F4-7.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT