You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 2, February 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Parental and physician-related determinants of consent for neonatal autopsy

L. J. VanMarter, F. Taylor and M. F. Epstein

We undertook a cross-sectional epidemiologic study of potential determinants of parental consent for neonatal autopsy at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston. Data were abstracted from maternal and infant medical records in 184 cases of neonatal death occurring between January 1982 and October 1984. The overall consent rate for neonatal autopsy was 72%. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression found previous fetal loss, gestational age, and cause of death to be significantly different between the groups of consenters and nonconsenters. Parents least likely to consent to autopsy were those who had no history of previous fetal loss, who had pregnancies in which the birth weight of the infant was less than 1000 g or the gestational age was less than 28 weeks, or those who had an infant die of extreme prematurity. Factors not significantly associated with consent were maternal age, race, marital status, transfer status, type of prenatal care, the infant's sex, and the staff position of the requester. A second phase of the study surveyed physicians' attitudes regarding the importance of neonatal autopsy. The staff position and previous experience of the physician-requester, in addition to the presumed cause of the infant's death, were significantly associated with the rating assigned to the importance of the autopsy. These findings suggest that the mother's past and present obstetrical experience, the presence of extreme prematurity, and possibly the attitude and experience of the physician requesting autopsy permission may exert important influences on the likelihood of obtaining consent for a neonatal autopsy.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

International Perspectives: The Role of the Neonatal Necropsy Today: A Scottish Perspective
Laing and Becher
NeoReviews 2006;7:e177-e182.
FULL TEXT  

Autopsy after death due to extreme prematurity
Elder and Zuccollo
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F270-f272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature
Snowdon et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F200-F203.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists
Snowdon et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F204-F207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents
Snowdon et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F208-F211.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paying Our Last Respects: The Neonatal Autopsy as Continuing Care and Ethical Obligation
Battaglia
NeoReviews 2003;4:e207-211.
FULL TEXT  

Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study
Brodlie et al.
BMJ 2002;324:761-763.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consent to autopsy for neonates
McHaffie et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;85:F4-7.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Provider Attitudes About Gaining Consent for Perinatal Autopsy
KHONG et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:994-998.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.