You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 3, March 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Frequency of Foreskin Problems in Uncircumcised Children

Lynn W. Herzog, MD, MPH; Susana R. Alvarez, MD, MPH

Am J Dis Child. 1986;140(3):254-256.


Abstract

• We performed a retrospective survey to determine the frequency of problems of the foreskin among uncircumcised children. Among 545 boys aged 4 months to 12 years, there were 272 uncircumcised boys and 273 control patients who were circumcised at birth. The total frequency of complications was significantly higher in the uncircumcised group (14% vs 6%). Both balanitis (6% vs 3%) and irritation (4% vs 1%) were more frequent among the uncircumcised children, but the difference was not statistically significant. Problems with adhesions were uncommon (1.5%) and equal in both groups. Symptomatic phimosis was seen in eight patients. The frequency of medical visits for penile problems was significantly higher in the uncircumcised group (10% vs 5%). Although the overall frequency of complications was higher among the uncircumcised children, most of the problems were minor.

(AJDC 1986;140:254-256)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital, Boston, and the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 16, 1985.

Reprint requests to Comprehensive Child Health Program, The Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Herzog).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neonatal Circumcision and Penile Inflammation in Young Boys
Van Howe
CLIN PEDIATR 2007;46:329-333.
ABSTRACT  

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision
Van Howe
Med Decis Making 2004;24:584-601.
ABSTRACT  

Circumcision practice patterns in South Korea: community based survey
Ku et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2003;79:65-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Circumcision Policy Statement
Task Force on Circumcision
Pediatrics 1999;103:686-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effective Treatment of Phimosis
Van Howe
Pediatrics 1998;102:e43-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine Neonatal Circumcision: A Cost-Utility Analysis
Ganiats et al.
Med Decis Making 1991;11:282-292.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.