You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 3, March 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outpatient Oral Rehydration in the United States

Robert Listernick, MD; Edward Zieserl, MD; A Todd Davis, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1986;140(3):211-215.


Abstract

• Twenty-nine dehydrated, well-nourished infants, who were 3 to 24 months of age and had acute gastroenteritis, were enrolled in a prospective randomized study that compared the safety, efficacy, and costs of oral vs intravenous rehydration. The study was designed to assess the use of a holding room in the emergency room for the outpatient rehydration of dehydrated infants. The oral solution that was used contained 60 mEq/L of sodium, 20 mEq/L of potassium, 50 mEq/L of chloride, 30 mEq/L of citrate, 20 g/L of glucose, and 5 g/L of fructose. Thirteen of 15 patients were successfully rehydrated orally as outpatients; two patients, who were subsequently discovered to have urinary tract infections, required hospitalization due to persistent vomiting. Orally rehydrated outpatients spent a mean of 10.7 hours in the holding room, as compared with intravenously rehydrated inpatients, who were hospitalized for a mean of 103.2 hours. Outpatient oral rehydration therapy was significantly less costly than inpatient intravenous therapy ($272.78 vs $2,299.50). Our results indicate that oral rehydration is a safe and cost-effective means of treating dehydrated children in an outpatient setting in the United States. The use of a holding room for observation in the emergency room can markedly decrease health care costs and unnecessary hospitalizations.

(AJDC 1986;140:211-215)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, and the Division of General and Emergency Pediatrics, The Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 29, 1985.

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the Ambulatory Pediatrics Association, Washington, DC, May 9, 1985.

Reprint requests to Division of General and Emergency Pediatrics, The Children's Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children's Plaza, Chicago, IL 60614 (Dr Listernick).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

DOES DRINKING "FLAT" COLA PREVENT DEHYDRATION IN CHILDREN WITH ACUTE GASTROENTERITIS?
Jacobs and Reece
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2008;93:129-131.
FULL TEXT  

An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management
Armon et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2001;85:132-142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Commonly Are Children Hospitalized for Dehydration Eligible for Care in Alternative Settings?
McConnochie et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:1233-1241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Rehydration Solution for Acute Diarrhea Prevents Subsequent Unscheduled Follow-up Visits
Duggan et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104 :e29-e29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Gastroentertis
Gastanaduy and Begue
CLIN PEDIATR 1999;38:1-12.
ABSTRACT  

Oral Rehydration Therapy for Diarrhea: An Example of Reverse Transfer of Technology
Santosham et al.
Pediatrics 1997;100:e10-e10.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Acute Gastroenteritis: Too Much and Too Little Care
Merrick et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1996;35:429-435.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.