You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 6, June 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Congenital Syphilis Revisited

Laurene Mascola, MD, MPH; Rocco Pelosi; Joseph H. Blount, MPH; Charles E. Alexander, MD, DrPH; Willard Cates, Jr, MD, MPH

Am J Dis Child. 1985;139(6):575-580.


Abstract

• Despite decades of experience with congenital syphilis, problems still arise in case definition, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and follow-up. We reviewed all 50 cases of early congenital syphilis reported to the State of Texas in 1982. A large proportion of the infants were premature (39%), of low birth weight (38%), and symptomatic at birth (62%). Because of these findings, we believe that possible cases of asymptomatic congenital syphilis in Texas may be under-reported. Laboratory and/or roentgenographic findings were important to confirm the diagnosis of congenital syphilis. Over half of the asymptomatic infants had positive results of cerebrospinal fluid VDRLs. After diagnosis, the treatment of infants with penicillin varied considerably. While all 47 living Infants were treated with penicillin, 21 different regimens were used. We urge all physicians to perform complete diagnostic evaluations on suspected infants consisting of a quantitative serum test for syphilis, serum IgM levels, a cerebrospinal fluid VDRL, roentgenographs of the long bones, and dark-field microscopy where indicated. Additionally, infants and their families need appropriate follow-up after treatment.

(AJDC 1985;139:575-580)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta (Drs Mascola and Cates and Mr Blount); and the Texas Department of Public Health, Austin (Mr Pelosi and Dr Alexander).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Dr Mascola).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Biological Basis for Syphilis
LaFond and Lukehart
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006;19:29-49.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community-Based Interventions for Improving Perinatal and Neonatal Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence
Bhutta et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:519-617.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Syphilis: Review with Emphasis on Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Some Biologic Features
Singh and Romanowski
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999;12:187-209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Leads from the MMWR
JAMA 1986;256:3205-3208.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.