You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 5, May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Survival of Infants With Spina Bifida—Atlanta, 1972-1979

Melissa M. Adams, MPH; Frank Greenberg, MD; Muin J. Khoury, MD; James S. Marks, MD, MPH; Godfrey P. Oakley, Jr, MD, MSPH

Am J Dis Child. 1985;139(5):518-523.


Abstract

• We studied the survival of a population-based cohort of 154 infants with spina bifida who were born during the eight-year period from 1972 through 1979 to residents of Atlanta. Our objectives were to describe the cohort's survival experience and to explore relationships between clinical characteristics and survival. Overall, 57% of the cohort survived one year or more. This figure is misleading, however, because it conceals important differences in survival among subgroups of affected infants. From univariate analyses, we observed significant differences in survival among infants categorized by year of birth, birth weight, the open-closed status of the defect, the highest level of the defect on the spine, the presence of multiple major birth defects, and the presence of hydrocephalus at birth. More infants born in the late 1970s survived their first year of life than infants born in the early 1970s; infants with open defects had lower survival than those with closed defects; and infants whose defects were low on the spine had better survival than those whose defects were higher. When comparing the survival experience of this cohort with that of other groups from other areas or from more recent years, health workers must consider referral biases and differences in the distribution of clinical characteristics.

(AJDC 1985;139:518-523)



Author Affiliations

From the Birth Defects Branch, Chronic Diseases Division, Center for Environmental Health (Ms Adams and Dr Oakley) and the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Nutrition, Center for Health Promotion and Education (Dr Marks), Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Atlanta; the Genetics Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Dr Greenberg); and the Department of Epidemiology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (Dr Khoury).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Publications Activities, Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Survival of children born with congenital anomalies
Dastgiri et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2003;88:391-394.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Population-Based Study of Survival and Childbearing among Female Subjects with Birth Defects and the Risk of Recurrence in Their Children
Skjarven et al.
NEJM 1999;340:1057-1062.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.