You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 12, December 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hospitalization v Outpatient Treatment of Young, Febrile Infants

Catherine DeAngelis, MD, MPH; Alain Joffe, MD, MPH; English Willis, MD; Modena Wilson, MD, MPH

Am J Dis Child. 1983;137(12):1150-1152.


Abstract

• Our medical center has an unwritten policy of admitting all febrile infants younger than 2 months of age. We studied this practice during a three-year period to determine what proportion of the febrile infants who came to the outpatient department were admitted. The characteristics of the infants who were not admitted were compared with those who were. The timing of and the infant's status at a subsequent visit for those not admitted were also identified. One hundred six (35%) of 303 encounters with young, febrile infants did not result in admissions. An infant was more likely to be admitted if he was male, younger than 30 days of age, and febrile (38.5 °C). None of the infants who were followed up as outpatients suffered morbidity that could be directly related to their not having been hospitalized.

(Am J Dis Child 1983;137:1150-1152)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr DeAngelis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Incidence and Predictors of Serious Bacterial Infections Among 57- to 180-Day-Old Infants
Hsiao et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1695-1701.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does leucocytosis identify bacterial infections in febrile neonates presenting to the emergency department?
Brown et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:256-259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictive Model for Serious Bacterial Infections Among Infants Younger Than 3 Months of Age
Bachur and Harper
Pediatrics 2001;108:311-316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Time to Detection of Positive Cultures in 28- to 90-Day-Old Febrile Infants
Kaplan et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:74e-74.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Efficacy of Routine Outpatient Management Without Antibiotics of Fever in Selected Infants
Baker et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:627-631.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outpatient Management without Antibiotics of Fever in Selected Infants
Baker et al.
NEJM 1993;329:1437-1441.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Is Fever?: Normal Temperature in Infants Less than 3 Months Old
Herzog and Coyne
CLIN PEDIATR 1993;32:142-146.
ABSTRACT  

Febrile Infants Less than Eight Weeks Old: Predictors of Infection
Broner et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1990;29:438-443.
ABSTRACT  

Management of Young, Febrile Infants: Primum non Nocere Revisited
ROBERTS
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1983;137:1143-1144.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.