You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 6, June 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Preschool Assessment of Infants With a Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Comparison of Ligation and Indomethacin Therapy

T. Allen Merritt, MD; Charlotte L. White, PhD; Ronald W. Coen, MD; William F. Friedman, MD; Louis Gluck, MD; Morton Rosenberg, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1982;136(6):507-512.


Abstract



• We report the preschool growth and development of preterm infants with problematic patent ductus arteriosus requiring either surgical ligation or indomethacin treatment in the neonatal period. Of 60 who completed longitudinal growth assessments, no differences in growth to 3 years could be demonstrated except at 18 months, when male infants who underwent surgical ligation were lighter than those treated with indomethacin. There were no significant differences in vision or hearing abnormalities except for four cases of regressed retinopathy of prematurity among the ligated infants. Developmental tests (Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test) showed no group differences at preschool ages. Although psychomotor performance on the Bayley Scales in the first 11/2 years was significantly lower among the surgically treated infants, later analysis showed that a similar number in both treatment groups scored within the normal range. No selective short- or long-term adverse effects of indomethacin treatment could be demonstrated.

(Am J Dis Child 1982;136:507-512)



Author Affiliations



From the Division of Neonatal/Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego (Drs Merritt, White, Coen, and Gluck); Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Health Sciences Center, Los Angeles (Dr Friedman); and Merch, Sharpe, and Dohme, Inc, West Point, Pa (Dr Rosenberg).


Footnotes



Read in part before the Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Australia, Nov 28, 1981.

Reprint requests to Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital H-814-J, 225 W Dickinson St, San Diego, CA 92103 (Dr Merritt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Historical Perspectives: A Look Back: The Clinical Initiation of Pharmacologic Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in the Preterm Infant
Friedman
Neoreviews 2003;4:e259-262.
FULL TEXT  

Developmental Sequelae in Premature Infants Undergoing Ligation of Patent Ductus Arteriosus
Wilkerson et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1985;39:541-546.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.