You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 4, April 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Somatic growth failure in infants related to artifact and error

G. E. Holmes, K. M. Hassanein and H. C. Miller

Growth failure in infants may be diagnosed erroneously because of artifact, error, or both. Assuming that all full-term infants have the same gestational age creates an artifact that is confounded further by errors in measurement of birth length. Crown-heel lengths of 77 while full-term newborns born at the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, were plotted on standard National Center for Health Statistics postnatal growth chart percentiles appropriate for sex, both with and without regard for gestational age. By the end of the first postnatal year, significantly fewer downward shifts in the growth curves occurred when fetal age was considered in the location of birth percentiles, according to tables by Miller and Merritt. To avoid confusion in interpretation of downward shifts in infants' growth patterns, we recommend that accurate crown-heel lengths be obtained at birth and plotted according to gestational age whenever possible.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.