You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 2, February 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Prospective evaluation of routine admission urinalyses

M. C. Hermansen and F. M. Blodgett

Nine hundred fifty-four pediatric patients admitted to our hospital had a "dipstick" urinalysis. Glucosuria, hematuria, and proteinuria were found in 6.0%, 5.3%, and 2.5%, respectively. By requiring two urinalyses and by eliminating artifacts that led to false-positive results, these rates declined to 0.9%, 2.2%, and 0.6%. A verbal "prompt" of the house staff was used to achieve a 95% follow-up rate. Four new diagnoses resulted from the effort: juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus, pelvic kidney, sickle cell trait, and asymptomatic bacteriuria. However, it is questionable as to whether any of these patients benefited. In addition, when specific screening criteria are applied, it is difficult to justify a routine screening urinalysis on every pediatric hospital admission. The cost of screening, diagnosis, and treatment was $3,671. Recommendations are given to those undertaking any hospital admission screening effort.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.