You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 5, May 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Circumcision and the Risk of Cancer of the Penis

A Life-Table Analysis

Mosze Kochen, MD, MPH; Stephen McCurdy, MPH

Am J Dis Child. 1980;134(5):484-486.


Abstract

• The low incidence of penile cancer in the United States is frequently cited as a reason for not justifying the risk of neonatal circumcision as a prophylactic measure. Although uncircumcised men are uniquely at risk for this malignant neoplasm, previous approaches have used annual incidence data collected without regard to circumcision status, thus tending to underestimate the true risk to this susceptible group. In addition, the concept of lifetime risk has not been addressed. Using data from the Third National Cancer Survey and previously published circumcision prevalence figures in a life-table analysis, we estimated the lifetime risk for cancer of the penis in uncircumcised males. The predicted risk is 166 per 105, or one in 600; the estimated median age of occurrence is 67 years. These data deserve to be considered with other morbidity factors in the context of the neonatal circumcision debate.

(Am J Dis Child 134:484-486, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Program in Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. Dr McCurdy is now with the University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, M-006, La Jolla, CA 92093 (Dr McCurdy).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision
Van Howe
Med Decis Making 2004;24:584-601.
ABSTRACT  

The Highly Protective Effect of Newborn Circumcision Against Invasive Penile Cancer
Schoen et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:36e-36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Trade-off Analysis of Routine Newborn Circumcision
Christakis et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:246-249.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence? • Commentary
Schoen; and HITCHCOCK
Arch. Dis. Child. 1997;77:258-260.
FULL TEXT  

Neonatal circumcision and penile cancer
Schoen
BMJ 1996;313:46b-46.
FULL TEXT  

A Perspective on Controversies About Neonatal Circumcision
Fleiss et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1995;34:395-399.
 

Routine Neonatal Circumcision: A Cost-Utility Analysis
Ganiats et al.
Med Decis Making 1991;11:282-292.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.